- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@perfectacademic.com
GEN 499 General Capstone Week 4 Journal International Drug Trafficking Essay
GEN 499 General Capstone Week 4 Journal International Drug Trafficking Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Language English Pages 5-10 pages Description/Paper Instructions
Subject General Education Topic Week 4 Journal International Drug Trafficking Type Essay Level High School Style APA Sources 5 Language English(U.S.) Description
Rough Draft Review Process Evaluation
[WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]Purpose: The primary goal of this weekly assignment is to enable you to understand the revision process and revise your paper with the help of a writing specialist.Prepare:
Step 1: Prepare a shortened version of your Final Paper (at least four pages) by including the following:
Introduction paragraph and thesis statement you developed for your Week 3 Assignment.
Background information of the global societal issue you have chosen.
Brief argument supporting at least two solutions to the global societal issue.
Conclusion paragraph.
Must document any information used from at least five scholarly sources in APA style as outlined in the Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) Note that you will need at least eight scholarly sources for your Final Paper in Week 5.Step 2: After you have completed a rough draft of your paper, submit that draft to the Ashford Writing Center by using the instructions found in the Paper Review (Links to an external site.) page. Your paper will be returned within 24 hours, so give yourself enough time to complete and submit it prior to the due date.
Reflect: Carefully review the revision letter and the margin comments that you see on your returned paper. Consider each of the suggestions provided to help you to revise your paper.
Write:
What You Need to Submit to Waypoint:
Upload the PDF document that contains the feedback from the Writing Center specialist.
Submit the journal assignment answering the following questions in at least 400 words:
Identify the top three issues your writing specialist focused on in your rough draft (e.g., paragraph structure, proper use of quotations, thesis statement, etc.).
In what ways were those issues surprising?
Describe what you learned from some of the feedback your writing specialist provided as explanations.
Was this feedback helpful?
Evaluate the usefulness of the paper review tool.
In what ways did this activity improve your academic writing skills?
Will you use the Ashford Writing Center to review your work in the future? Why or why not?
Identify Writing Center Video Tutorials (Links to an external site.) that you find most useful and explain why. Also, identify tutorial(s) you found least useful and explain why.The journal part of the assignment does not need to be formatted in APA style; however, correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation is required.
International drug trafficking
Narrowing Down Topic
First, I read through the list of topics and determined the ones I had an interest in studying further or knowing more about. From the chosen topics, I selected the ones I felt too strongly about, on any one side and eliminated them from the list of possible topics to write about (Booth, 2016). I selected the topic is thought I had substantial arguments from different angles and to narrow it down, I considered the aspect of possible solutions to the problem of international drug trafficking instead of tackling the whole topic which would entail a wide scope from financial, productions and the individuals involved.
Critically Analyzing Sources
First is to consider the authors of the source in question. The information on the author provided should inform of the authors’ qualification, such that one can determine if they qualify to write on the topic (GSU, 2020). If these criteria checks true, it is likely the source is scholarly.
Second, the publisher of the information. For scholarly sources, the publisher should be academic institution, professional organization, a scholarly trade publisher (GSU, 2020). Also, the publisher should avail the peer-review or editorial policy. If the publisher information is provided and meets this criteria, the source is likely to be scholarly.
Lastly, the purpose of the source or information there-in is crucial in determining if a source is scholarly. One should look at the purpose of the information, which the authors should make clear in scholarly works. Further, the information should be fact, not opinion or propaganda (GSU, 2020). The point of view should be impartial and appear objective.
Summaries
Matthew Jenner (2011) argues that although international drug trafficking is a global problem, the solution lies in universally legalizing drugs to eliminate the profit advantage from the traffickers and give monitoring and control to states (Jenner, 2011). With the power to regulate the drugs trade, states will keep the drug market in check and avoid the supernormal profits that drive drug cartels to limitless ends.
Cardoso and Netos (2016) argue that the emphasis on criminalizing the drug problem and application of standard punitive model instead of alternative solutions has hindered solving the problem at state and thus global level (Cardoso & netos, 2016). The authors propose the application of restorative justice to international and national drug trafficking to deal with drug offences instead of the current retributive approaches.
Why Scholarly Sources
The credibility and authority evident in academic sources will improve the general quality of the argument on this topic.
References
Booth, W.C. (2016). The Craft of Research. Fourth edition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
Cardoso, H.R. & Netos, O.R. (2016). The importance of justice restorative to combat drug trafficking. Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos, 2(2), 186-206
GSU. (2020). Researching & Writing Literature Reviews in Religious Studies: Identifying Scholarly Sources. Georgia State University
Jenner, M.S. (2011). International drug trafficking: A global problem with a domestic solution. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18 (2), 901-92
Spacing Double Pages 5
RUBRIC
Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
