Week 12 Discussion: Balanced Scorecard
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Week 12 Discussion: Balanced Scorecard
Week 12 Discussion: Balanced Scorecard (Click to Read Instructions)
Week 12 – Balanced Scorecard
Discussion Question
Students must support their discussion with at least 4 academically reviewed articles. (Wikipedia, Smallbusinesschron.com and other internet articles are not acceptable. Professor reviews the originality of all postings). Do not copy and paste.
Review at least 4 articles on Balanced Scorecard and complete the following activities:
- Write annotated summary of each article. Use APA throughout.
- As an IT professional, discuss how you will use Balanced Scorecard to manage IT resources efficiently.
Complete your main post no later than Friday of week 12 (4 pm PST). Please note that initial post not completed on the due date will receive zero grade.
Read and respond to at least two (2) of your classmates Friday of week 12 (4 pm PST)of week 12.
Review posting/discussion requirements.
Please use APA throughout in your main post and responses to other posts.
Below are additional suggestions on how to respond to your classmates’ discussions:
- Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
- Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
- Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research.
- Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
- Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
- Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
My Friends’ Discussion .
Discussion 1 :-
In the article, Balanced Scorecard is characterized as execution report utilized as an administration device to monitor those activities going ahead in an association with the point of keeping check of those activities while dissecting the conceivable outcomes (Hoque, 2014). As indicated by the article, Balanced Scorecard is significantly utilized for vital administration and operational execution. As a chief, Balanced Scorecard can be utilized as an essential device in assessing the execution of different units and the whole association demonstrating satisfactory data for administrative choices.
In another article, we are acquainted with the different attributes that characterize a Balanced Scorecard. As indicated by the creator, there are four essential properties of the execution instrument. One, it makes out of a blend of both budgetary and non-money related information and data. Also, Balanced Scorecard centers particularly around key plan of the association. At last, the instrument targets little quantity and scope of information to monitor (Hansen and Schaltegger, 2016). Every one of these properties shape the vital achievement part for directors in utilizing the execution report instrument in the arrangement of consequences of the assessment.
In the article, the writer fundamentally talks about the historical backdrop of Balanced Scorecard and the present insights of utilization in different organizations and associations. The principal occasion where the execution device was utilized was in 1987 (Nikolaou and Tsalis, 2013). It was made by Art Schneiderman at Analog Devices. This was alluded to as the Analog Balanced Scorecard. The change in competency prompted the progression of the simple device to the present age Balanced Scorecard. Supervisors have progressively favored the utilization of execution report instrument in key assessment The idea of the association activities. The key guide has upgraded the administrative accomplishment of such directors.
In the fourth article, the writer centers around the popularity of the Balanced Scorecard. Diagnostically, most organizations utilize the apparatus in execution monitoring and administration. In an examination led by Kurtzman in 1997, around 64% of organizations utilized Balanced Scorecard (Reefke and Trocchi, 2013). The rest of the rate that was not utilizing the device utilized another approach that was more like the balanced scorecard. As indicated by the article, Balanced Scorecard stays one of the broadly received and connected execution administration system.
As an IT director, a Balanced Scorecard is a critical instrument in its effective administration assets. It is imperative to record and break down IT data utilizing this sensitive device. This incorporates detailing the audit investigate working and task of the IT foundation and the related activities. An arrangement of activities ought to be produced to go about as a plan for monitoring and assessment. The data is recorded in the Balanced Scorecard for key mapping. The apparatus improves exactness and accommodation in the accompanying execution while getting bits of knowledge on the patterns. IT supervisors should utilize the device in vital administration and assessment of IT execution.
Reference
Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2016). The sustainability balanced scorecard: A systematic review of architectures. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 193-221.
Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British accounting review, 46(1), 33-59.
Nikolaou, I. E., & Tsalis, T. A. (2013). Development of a sustainable balanced scorecard framework. Ecological Indicators, 34, 76-86.
Reefke, H., & Trocchi, M. (2013). Balanced scorecard for sustainable supply chains: design and development guidelines. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(8), 805-826.
Discussion 2:-
Introduction:
The Balanced Scorecard(BSC) is a methodology which helps in evaluating the performance and success ratio of the business by taking multiple criteria into account. In general, companies evaluate success by calculating profits with respect investment, in other words, return on investment which is not a right way to evaluate because the success of a company depends upon multiple attributes. The balanced scorecard on the hand evaluates customer satisfaction, internal processes involved in the company, learning, and innovation (Simon, 2005). This methodology has challenges related to adoption but, it helps the organization to evaluate the performance of resources, planning processes and taking crucial decisions of an organization.
Application of balanced scorecard methodology:
According to the article published by (Punniyamoorthy & Murali, 2008), a model is created to using balanced scorecard that is used to evaluate the performance of a company by setting benchmarks for financial, non-financial, expected vs actual performance, activities that are necessary for the growth of a company. Information technology resources provide tools to communicate, plan, initiate, design, deploy rest of the departments. It is difficult to measure the value of IT resources because the benefits provided may not reflect in short-term but has a potential value in the long term. BSC helps in evaluating the performance in terms of financial and non-non-financial aspects of an organization (Beard & Humphrey, 2014).
Conclusion:
As an IT professional, I will make use of fundamental principles of a balanced scorecard methodology to evaluate the performance of IT resources. I will calculate the salary of human resources and evaluate their performance by calculating the value provided by the resource to the company in terms of cost. I will calculate the investment in infrastructure, hardware and software resources and evaluate results by comparing expected versus actual performance results. As mentioned in the article published by (Mansor & Bahari, 2010), I will integrate Enterprise resource planning and BSC for effective results. I will evaluate the customer satisfaction by using customer feedback options, response time, network traffic etc. I will evaluate the internal processes with respect to the factors like ease of usage and adaptability, the duration that processes are updated, improvement in the use of tools to make daily activities as efficient as possible, network and information security and awareness of the organization, IT governance, compliance policies and decision support system. I will evaluate the abilities of resources like certification in particular languages, innovation of resources, learning new technologies that help company’s growth.
References:
Beard, D. F., & Humphrey, R. L. (2014). Alignment of University Information Technology Resources With the Malcolm Baldrige Results Criteria for Performance Excellence in Education: A Balanced Scorecard Approach. Journal Of Education For Business, 89(7), 382-388. doi:10.1080/08832323.2014.916649
Mansor, N., & Bahari, A. (2010). Enterprise Resource Planning Benefits and Managerial Decison Levels. International Journal Of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 6(1), 153-165.
M., P., & R., M. (2008). Balanced score for the balanced scorecard: a benchmarking tool. Benchmarking: An International Journal, (4), 420. doi:10.1108/14635770810887230
Simon, S. J. (2005). Balanced Scorecard: A Tool to Improve IS Department Planning and Evaluation. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CASES AND APPLICATIONS, (4). 7.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!