Wealth Slave ownership and Confederate Fighting Article Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
About
Journal articles are peer-reviewed publications that aid in the communication of ideas, theories, empirical analyses, and conclusions among academics.
Critical reading of journal articles is a skill that can be honed with practice. This ability will come in handy if you decide to transfer to a four-year institution or university.If you want to go to graduate school for a Masters, professional, or doctoral degree, you’ll need to be able to analyze journal articles.
Reading and analyzing a journal paper are two different things. Reading is a skill that can be honed through practice and is crucial for your academic, professional, and personal goals.Your reading load will increase academically with each semester of higher education. Building that talent now will benefit you in the long run.
Contracts, employee handbooks, technical manuals, financial reports, and other documents will be required reading on a professional level.
Your kid, daughter, nephew, or niece, for example, will require you to teach them to read.
Time Estimated
This task will take approximately 270 minutes to complete.
Instructions
Step 1: Download the article’s PDF.
Andrew B. Hall, Connor Huff, and Shiro Kuriwaki. POSC 121. An Empirical Study of the American Civil War, Wealth, Slaveownership, and Fighting for the Confederacy. The American Political Science Review, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 65873, is a journal published by the American Political Science Association. download https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000170
Step 2: Examine the Text
Recognize the 12 parts of the article, as stated in the Anatomy of a Journal Article and expanded upon in the Details of Analyzing Journal Articles, then study the Walkthrough.If you want a third party to help you think through this project, schedule a tutoring appointment with the Writing Center or meet with a NetTutor (if available).
Upload a snapshot of your NetTutor encounter or a picture of your Writing Center tutoring slip as evidence.
Step 3: Demonstrate part identification.
Handwrite on the margins or the back of the page with a pen.
Electronically highlight the text and/or make a note in the page margins.
Step 4: Outline the Research Plan
Only one of the 12 components, Research Design, needs to be written out. The author compares the effect of the explanatory variable (X) on the outcome variable (O) in a group (G) or collection of groups using the Research Design.
If you require more information, go go to the Details of Analyzing Journal Articles page and the Walkthrough Presentation.
On my personal website, go to the “Journal Article Analysis” page (Links to an external site.)
Read Chapter 6 Elements of Study Design in Introduction to Political Science Research Methods for a more in-depth look at research design (Links to an external site.)
You can also participate in an iPoliSci Journal Article Analysis Workshop.
Step 5: Submit your file for upload.
Paper: If you handwrote your analysis on a printed piece of paper, please utilize the CamScanner software (Links to an external site. ), and use the “Batch” function to photograph each page and create a single PDF. Please upload the file once a single PDF has been prepared.Option 1: You can submit the annotated file if you used Adobe PDF software to annotate it.
Option 2 (electronic): Try annotating in the Canvas Student App.
In the Student app on my iOS device, how do I submit a PDF assignment with annotations? (This is a link to another website.)
In the Student app on my Android device, how do I submit a PDF assignment with annotations? (This is a link to another website.)
Support
Go to How do I see my instructor’s annotated feedback remarks in my assignment submission? (This is a link to another website.) can see how, in contrast to the Assignment Comments or Rubric Results, I directly include feedback on the file you upload.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!