Ways of Improving Patient Healthcare Outcomes
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Ways of Improving Patient Healthcare Outcomes
Organizational Assessment
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to assess for organizational gaps or problems, allowing us to explore the process you would follow to determine the organization.
Instructions
Reflect upon your readings and consider a practice problem or the practice problem you have identified for your DNP project, and respond to the following:
Describe the process you would follow to assess the organization where you plan to conduct your project for opportunities for improvement, including the identification of stakeholders.
Determine the ultimate goals for your DNP project and how they relate to the organization’s mission and vision.
*** These are some ideas that may help to answer but feel free to use the best ideas or information that you consider pertinent.****
** I want to assess practice issues in STDs prevention and treatment clinic; I will use a SWOT analysis tool. (for me was the most simple to use).**
[SWOT: Typically, when conducting a needs-based organizational assessment, a SWOT analysis is used to determine what impacts an organization. A SWOT analysis is a tool used to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. It will identify the internal and external factors that affect achieving that objective with an overall look at the project in areas that will support the project and areas that may need more attention (Waxman, 2020, pp. 156-159).]
- Strengths – Of the organization, advantages in the industry:
** {The clinic has a multidisciplinary team that works together in Miami Dade County to improve the health of the community. Everyone understands the organization’s purpose and is willing to work providing personalized and outstanding care for STDs prevention and treatment services of each patient.}
- Weaknesses – Of the organization, areas with underperformance and vulnerability
**{More work is needed to initiate and implement direct screening of vulnerable populations like the homeless, drug users, and adolescents with high-risk sexual behavior. These efforts need more funds and will require the intervention of the government and other supporting institutions (Kantor et al., 2020).
- Opportunities – Underserved areas, areas for growth, or new service:
** {I was able to identify some underserved areas that, with improvements, can grant the development of the company and at the same time will represent significant profit sources while improving patient healthcare outcomes. For example, the clinic has an extensive laboratory with complete lab equipment that can amplify the range of the testing labs. Floor, but only one part of it is in full use.
- Threats – External issues including regulatory, competition, and outdated services or practices:
**{The decision-maker of the office says that although the clinic has a complete and advanced lab in place, most of the labs are not performed on-site because they continue dealing with some difficulty obtaining Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certification. Only some urine rapid tests are performed in the office; the rest are collected and sent to an external lab.
Usually, the external laboratory dispatches the results of the difficulties in five to seven days, which delays the treatment delivery and raises the possibility of STDs transmission to the community. Further STD transmission can be halted if an infected patient receives early treatment during an initial visit.}**
**[ Florida has a high STD prevalence of sexually transmitted illnesses, and Miami Dade County is most affected by this problem. I’m collaborating with a Miami-Dade County community-based clinic, bringing awareness to the community about sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and offering testing along with that awareness. The organization’s mission is to provide patients with quality and affordable care to allow the community to have a safer, more enjoyable life.
The clinic’s vision is to create awareness in the community about the risk of having unprotected sex and the need to stop STDs transmission. The STD program fights sexually transmitted diseases one person at a time by offering screening, testing, diagnosis, and treatment for afflicted individuals. Another goal of the STD program is to identify and provide prophylactic treatment and counseling to sexual partners of confirmed cases. The program’s intervention serves to safeguard infected people, their partners, and their unborn children from the catastrophic consequences of untreated STDs.]**
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!