Way of Giving Appropriate Credit to Sources for Ideas
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Way of Giving Appropriate Credit to Sources for Ideas
Teaching Program Graduate Forum Rubric
Responses to other learners should be substantive posts that contribute to the discussion by asking questions, respectfully debating positions, and presenting supporting information relevant to the topic. APA style for in-text citing is no longer required, but is optional. But, mentioning in-course readings’ authors and out-of-course readings’ authors is required as a way of giving appropriate credit to sources for ideas, data, or information. A reference list of in-course readings mentioned is not required. But, a reference list for any outside sources mentioned is required.
Criterion Exemplary 4 (4 points)
Accomplished 3 (3.4 points)
Developing 2 (3 points)
Beginning 1 (2.6 points)
Did Not Attempt 0 (0 points)
Substance Explores, explains, and expands upon issue being discussed. Applies relevant course materials.
(50%)
Evaluates course concepts, theories, or materials correctly, using well-documented examples or exceptional supporting evidence from required readings and/or additional peer-reviewed research. Analyzes course concepts, theories, or materials correctly, demonstrating an effective presentation of thesis, with most supporting evidence from required readings and/or additional peer-reviewed research helping to strengthen the thesis. Applies a basic understanding of course concepts, but thesis is not fully supported with evidence from required readings and/or additional peer-reviewed research. The reader may have difficulty seeing linkages between thoughts. Attempts to explain relevant course concepts, theories, or materials, but reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Evidence from required readings and/or additional peer-reviewed research is minimal to none. No postings observed Collaboration Collaborates with fellow learners, relating the discussion to course concepts
(10%)
Added several innovative ideas and information to the discussion. Provided considerable additional insight. Asked relevant questions to classmates. Provided a few new ideas and information to the discussion. Provided some additional insight. No questions asked. Provided one new idea or item to the discussion. No additional insight. Reiterated some of peer’s thoughts. No new ideas or insight added to the discussion. No questions asked. Reiterated peer’s thoughts.
No postings observed Timeliness Submits initial posts and responses according to assignment timelines
(5%)
Initial submission and responses meet posting deadline requirements. Initial submission meets posting deadline. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline. Initial submission one day later than deadline. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline. Initial submission more than one day late. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline. No postings observed Quantity Quantity of Forum contributions
(25%)
Minimum number of postings (original post and replies) that follow all word requirements.
Fewer than the minimum number of required postings (original post and at least two replies, unless otherwise defined) OR posts do not meet minimum word requirements. Original posting only. May or may not meet word requirement.
No posts made. No postings observed Writing Mechanics/APA Adherence to academic spelling and grammar conventions
(10%)
Communicates through writing that is concise, balanced, and logically organized; no spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors; gives author credit to ideas/information from in-course/out-of-course scholarly sources; and includes a reference list in APA style for scholarly sources beyond course readings. Communicates through writing that is balanced, and logically organized; fewer than 2 spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors; and/or does not give author credit for info/ideas; and/or does not include a reference list in APA style for scholarly sources beyond course readings.
Communicates through writing that may not be balanced or logically organized; between 2 and 5 spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors; and/or does not give author credit for info/ideas; and/or does not include a reference list in APA style for scholarly sources beyond course readings. Demonstrates an inappropriate level of written communication skill; fewer than 7, but more than 5 spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors; and does not refer to scholarly ideas from the body of literature. No postings observed
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!