Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Philosophy Final Paper
Directions: The essay has two prompts. You must answer both prompts fully. Submit a 6-page paper (1450-word count, 12-inch font, double spaced, 1- inch margins – no more than 7 pages) addressing both prompts. Utilize the reading materials and class discussions. Demonstrate that you understand the arguments presented by the authors. Throughout your paper, cite your sources systematically. Be mindful of the following: There is no need to plagiarize. You are capable of completing the assignment without plagiarizing. However, if you do plagiarize, you will receive a zero. Suppress the inclination to google fish. Exercise your ability to think about the subject matter.To receive full credit: ▪Both prompts addressed ▪ Clearly stated the answer to the problem/question ▪ Clearly laid out arguments of the authors ▪ Applicable concepts indicated and explained in own words ▪ Evidence from texts cited properly ▪ Minor errors with grammar and punctuation ▪ Cogent conclusion provided
As you write your paper, pose the following questions: ▪ Did I clearly lay out the arguments? ▪ Have I shown the way(s) they function and relate to the topic under examination? ▪ Have I strayed from the problem/question? ▪ Have I cited the sources systematically within my paper (author, text title, and page number)?
Prompt 1 – Violence: Analysis and Comparison What is the problem? The world is saturated with violence. Angela Davis and Michael Fleming discuss the nature of violence. In your own words, explain the scope of their discussions, the ways in which their arguments are similar and/or different and the impact of their arguments upon your understanding of violence. *As signposts to help you develop your analysis and comparative framework, think through and include the following: a) Clearly lay out the arguments of Davis and Fleming separately b) What are the reasons for their claims? c) Are their arguments similar? If yes, how so – specifically? If no, how? d) Are their arguments different? If yes, how so – specifically? If no, how? e) Given the scale of violence, what does each author say about a solution (or lack of a solution) to the problem? f) If a solution was presented, what is it? Why is it viable? If the author indicated that there is no solution to the problem of violence, what is the ground for her/his assertion? g) What contemporary examples can you draw from to highlight their viewpoints about the problem?
Prompt 2 – Death, Dying and Living: Analysis and Comparison What is the problem? Death awaits everyone. Bob Plant and Claire Wineland discuss the nature of death. In your own words, explain the scope of their discussions, the ways in which their arguments are similar and/or different and the impact of their arguments upon your understanding of death and dying. *As signpoststo help you develop your analysis and comparative framework, think through and include the following: a) Clearly lay out Plant’s arguments about the problem he intends to address b) What does Plant mean by the banality of death? Why does he think ‘this’ distinction is key to talking about death? c) What does Wineland say about death and dying? How does she support her articulations? d) Although Plant and Wineland base their views from different stances, do they have similar viewpoints? If yes, what are they specifically? If no, how are the perspectives different? e) Given the inevitability and imminence of death, what does each say about living/life? Why is this important to grasping the nature of death and dying? f) What contemporary examples can you draw from to highlight their viewpoints about the problem?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!