Vestiges, Embryos, and Bad Design Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Vestiges, Embryos, and Bad Design Essay
Running head: WHY IS EVOLUTION TRUE 1
Why is Evolution True 3
Why is Evolution True
Saleh Harris
August 2, 2019
SCI-115SC
Professor Wilder
Why is Evolution True
Religion is the first concept of how thing have come into existing. When you’re an adult, the story of Adam and Eve make less sense compared to when you were five years old. I’ll be using Jerry Coyne, Why Evolution is True to provide insight on evolution through scientific evidence.
What is Evolution?
Author Jerry A.Coyne opens with William Paley’s watchmaker analogy as proof of God as the designer of all things. Darwin believed that evolution and natural selection started creation. Coyne defines modern evolution as life on primitive species earth evolved gradually beginning one primitive species or DNA that exist eons ago, that branched out over tie, throwing off many new and diverse species, and the mechanism for most of the evolutionary change is natural selection. (Coyne3) Six components that the theory of evolution can be broken down into are evolution, gradualism, speciation, common ancestry, natural selection, and nonselective mechanisms of evolutionary change.
Evolution is the change in characteristics of a species over time that relies on the process of natural selection. Over many eons, a species can evolve into something entirely different, and those differences on changes in the DNA, which originate as mutations. (Coyne3)
Gradualism which takes many generations to produce a substantial evolutionary change, such as the evolution of birds from reptiles. (Coyne4) Speciation is the evolution of different groups that can’t interbreed that is, groups that can’t exchange genes. Species split because of populations to evolve enough differences that they are no longer able to interbreed. The vast majority of species go extinct without leaving any descendants. (Coyne7)
Common ancestry is DNA sequences or fossils evidence that finds descendants joining at their ancestors. (Coyne8)
Natural selection is the design in nature by a purely materialistic process that doesn’t require creation or guidance by supernatural forces. Over time, the population will gradually adjust to its environment during mutations and expand within individuals having a quality or characteristic in common, while deleterious ones are weeded out. It requires only those individuals of a species vary genetically in their ability to survive and reproduce in their environment. (Coyne10-11)
Nonselective mechanisms of evolutionary change So natural selection does not yield perfection — only improvements over what came before. Its s done in small increments over time. ( Coyne13) A scientific theory is a statement that’s looked at as laws, principles, or because of something known or observed. So before a theory can be thought of as being scientific, it must be testable and make valid predictions. (Conye15)
Written in the Rocks
Written in the Rocks shows how fossils provide evidence of evolution. The fossil formation is straightforward but requires a particular set of circumstances. The animal or plant remains have to reach water, sink to the bottom of the water, and then get covered by sediment so that they don’t decay or get scattered by scavengers. (Coyne21) Fossils that record give no evidence for the creationist believe that all species appear divinely and perfect. Instead of life forms appearing in the records in evolutionary sequence and then evolve and split. (Coyne32) Transitional forms fossils span the gap between two very different kinds of living organisms. One of the most significant fulfilled predictions of evolutionary biology is the discovery, in 2004, of a transitional form between fish and amphibians. The fossils species Tiktaalik, which tells us a lot about how vertebrates came to live on the land. (Coyne35)
Tiktaalik
Neil Shubin’s discovery of the Tiktaalik is beneficial to evolution. It is a 375 million years old fish fossil found in Ellesmerette island in Nunavut, Canada. The Tiktaalik has scales like a fish, a neck, flathead, and small limbs like a land animal. It can be linked not us (Shubin17-30) Tiktaalik proves that our ancestors were flat-headed predatory fish that lurked in the shallow waters of streams. It is a fossil that marvelously connects fish with amphibians. This discovery was not only anticipated but predicted to occur in rocks of a certain age and a particular place. (Coyne38)
Vestiges, Embryos, and Bad Design
Vestige is a feature of species that adaptation in its ancestors and lost its usefulness. For example, human wisdom teeth. (Coyne57) It is vestigial not because it’s functionless, but because it no longer performs the function for which it evolved. (Coyne58)
Atavisms is the reappearance of an ancestral trait. An example is a horse born with extra toes, a human baby with a tail. These expressed remnants of ancestral features are called atavisms. The difference atavisms and vestigial traits are atavisms occasionally occur rather than in every individual. (Coyne64)
Embryology
The study of how animals develop is Embryology. The similarities and differences in the structures of a different animal (comparative anatomy). In Darwin studies, vertebrates began development in the same way and favored an embryotic fish. As the development process continues, they form into a fish, mammal, reptile, or amphibian, but in the beginning stage, they all look alike.
Bad Design
Bad Design is the belief that if organisms were built from scratch by a designer; that use biological building blocks of nerves, muscles, bone, etc.. They would not have such imperfections. The perfect design would indeed be the mark of an intelligent designer or God.
The Geography of Life
Biogeography is the study of the natural geographic range of an organism on earth. The Biogeographic theory debunks the creationist story of Noah Ark. The post-flood location of the Ark is in Turkey near Mount Ararat. The similar forms in different places, or how does the Kangaroo get to Australia from Turkey??? (Coyne88)
Conclusion
In conclusion, Jerry Coyne Why Evolution Is True was used to provide evidence of evolution through. I used fossils, biogeography, natural selection, comparative embryology, comparative anatomy, and molecular biology to present evidence of evolution. I explain the concept of Natural Selection as the means for which evolution occurs. Philosophical, theological, and sociological reflections as well as a demonstration of a scientific understanding of evolution.
References
Coyne, J. A. (2010). Why evolution is true. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Shubin, N. (2009). Your inner fish: The amazing discovery of our 375-million-year-old ancestor. London: Penguin Books.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!