Variance Analysis for Papaya Partners
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Variance Analysis for Papaya Partners
BUS 5110 UNIT 5 VARIANCE ANALYSIS
Variance Analysis for Papaya Partners
BUS 5110: Managerial Accounting
Written Assignment Unit 5
Abstract
Variance analysis is a tool used by managers to compare planned and actual performance. It is a qualitative analysis “used to maintain control over a business (AccountingTools, 2018).” Through the use of a revised master budget called a flexible budget using standard costing, companies can analyze where financial expectations are met or fall short and take action based on that information. Once standard prices and quantities are established, those numbers can be compared to actual numbers to establish favorable or unfavorable performance. While companies can perform variance analysis on many different factors, it is really only necessary to do so in the areas that most affect the business.
Keywords: variance analysis
VARIANCE ANALYSIS FOR PAPAYA PARTNERS
Papaya Partners is a wholesaler who purchases from individual growers, repackages the fruit and sells the packages primarily to supermarkets. (University of the People, 2019) As is standard practice every year, managers wants to review the company’s actual performance against the budget and understand where any variances are coming from.
Variance analysis has been performed to determine the following:
standard cost per carton = std cost of fruit + std cost of labor + std cost of packaging ($10+$4.50+$.50=$15)
standard cost of fruit = direct materials $ fruit / total units sold ($200,000/20,000=$10)
standard cost of packaging = direct packaging $ / total units sold ($10,000/20,000=$.50
standard cost of labor = direct labor $ / total units sold ($90,000/20,000=$4.50)
actual cost per carton = actual cost fruit + actual cost of labor + actual cost of packaging
($12.21+$.55+$7.50=$20.26)
actual cost of fruit = actual direct materials $ fruit / total units sold ($244,200/200,00=$12.21)
actual cost of packaging = actual direct materials $ packaging / total units sold ($11,000/20,000=$.55)
actual cost of labor = actual direct labor $ / total units sold ($150,000/20,000=$7.50)
direct materials price variance = actual cost – standard cost ($255,200-$210,000=$45,200)
actual cost = (actual cost fruit + actual cost packaging) x units sold (($12.21+$.55)x20,000=$255,200)
standard cost = (std cost fruit + std cost packaging) x units sold (($10+$.50)x20,000=$210,000)
direct materials usage variance = (actual usage – standard usage) x standard cost ((20,000-20,000)x$.50=0)
direct labor rate variance = (actual rate x actual hours) – (standard rate x actual hours) ($150,000-$135,000=$15,000)
actual labor hours = 20,000 x .75 = 15,000
actual rate = $150,000/15,000 = $10, 15,000 x $10 = $150,000
standard labor hours = 20,000 x .5 = 10,000
standard rate = $90,000 / 10,000 = $9, 15,000 x $9 = $135,000
direct labor efficiency rate = (actual hours – standard hours) x standard rate ($15,000-$10,000)x$9=$45,000
CONCLUSIONS
The direct materials price variance, direct labor rate variance and direct labor efficiency variance are all unfavorable which indicates that Papaya Partners needs to take a closer look as what is causing these inefficiencies.
The unfavorable direct materials price variance stems from the purchase of packaging materials. The actual price spent on materials is greater than the standard price. The purchasing manager should be tasked with investigating where the overage comes from. Were more materials purchased than expected or was the price of the materials higher than planned? If the issue of the overage is due to waste, employees should be trained on how to cut back or eliminate being wasteful. If it’s a pricing issue, the company should either negotiate a better rate with the supplier, consider purchasing from a new supplier or determine if they can package the papayas in a way that takes fewer materials.
The manager who oversees the employees processing the papayas and Human Resources should be asked to take a look at why the actual rate of labor exceeded the standard rate. This could be caused by more experienced workers were hired at a higher rate or a larger workforce than planned for. In either case, one would think this would mean great efficiency, which the efficiency variance contradicts. The company should review the rate of pay for the employees and ensure that it is inline with their experience and with other similar positions in the area.
This same manager should take a look at why employees were less efficient packaging the papaya. Looking at the numbers, it appears that the issue lay in the time to process a carton, .75 hours per carton actual versus .5 hours per carton standard. This could be due to the fact that there are new employees on the line who aren’t as efficient or perhaps the time to process a carton was underestimated. One solution could be additional training for employees.
Variance analysis is extremely valuable in identifying areas of improvement within a company. Taking action on the issues in a timely manner can keep a company running efficiently and successfully.
REFERENCES
Accounting Tools. (2018 December 21). Variance Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/what-is-variance-analysis.html
University of the People. (n.d.). Business 5110: Managerial Accounting Unit 5 Written Assignment. Retrieved from https://my.uopeople.edu/mod/workshop/view.php?id=194035
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!