Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Using Public Health Program to Address STIs
Using, Public, Health, Program, Address, STIs
1. You and your team from the local health department have been tasked with starting a
public health program to address the rapid increase in sexually transmitted diseases in
an area with a large immigrant population. What key strategies would you employ with
the community before starting this program?
What are some foreseen issues and barriers to implementing this program among this
population? What are the cultural implications that might be considered given the target
population?
2. You are newly hired as the CEO of a global public health organization. What would
your five key priorities and strategies be around leadership and management in your
first 100 days? Consider your role as THE leader of the organization and what
approaches you might take.
3. You have just been appointed the Director of Public Health of Any State, USA. As the
new Director, you have the power to enact only one (or build on a previously existing)
policy during your tenure. Select an issue that you think applying a policy solution will
make the most significant impact on the health and well-being of people in your state.
Using the policy cycle we discussed in class, please provide an example of how you
might develop a policy to address your chosen issue. (HINT: Briefly describe your
approach at each segment of the policy cycle from start to finish!)
4. You will utilize the information presented by your group (name your state) to develop
and implement a strategy for moving forward with your goals and objectives. Please
refer to Parts IV and V of the strategic planning exercise below.
For this question, you will submit two tables–a version of Table 2 with your rationale
and a completed Table 3 for your implementation strategy (budget). Table 1 is for your
planning and strategizing purposes only. The first portion (strategy rationale) is worth 10
points. The budget is worth 5 points.
Information for Question 4
Part IV—Developing a Strategy
Compare the health department’s current programs with the needs of the external
environment (the results of your external environmental analyses) within the context of
the Department’s vision, mission, and strategic goals.
You will develop a strategy for the Health Department by modifying (if necessary) the
portfolio of programs so that they best address the needs of your environment as
identified in the environmental analysis.
You have three options regarding programs and services—reduce or eliminate;
maintain the existing portfolio; and add new programs and services; and you have three
options regarding the population served—reduce the number of clients; maintain the
existing number of clients; and add new clients.
The program decisions consist of two elements—the "Program Strategy Matrix" and the
"Program Strategy Rationale." The Program Strategy Matrix is used to record your
decisions regarding programs and clients. The format of the Program Strategy Matrix is
shown in the following table.
Please note that the cells are numbered, these numbers will be used as references in
the preparation of the Program Strategy Rationale. Please keep in mind that the
Program Strategy Matrix (Table 1) is just a guide used to create the Program Strategy
Rationale (Table 2).
Table 1. Program Strategy Matrix
Actions Affecting
Programs and
Services
Actions Affecting
Populations Served
by Programs
Reduce Types or
Numbers of Clients Keep Type or Number of
Clients the Same Add New Clients
Reduce
Programs or
Services
1
Contract Scope,
Eliminate Program
2
Contract Scope, Change
Focus
3
Expand Scope,
Refocus
Keep Programs
or Services the
Same
4
Contract Scope,
Change Focus
5
Maintain Scope, Reduce
Costs, Improve Efficiency,
Improve Quality
6
Expand Scope,
New Target Clients
Add New
Programs or
Services
7
Contract Scope,
Refocus
8
New Services
9
Expand Scope,
New Services,
New Target Client
The format of the Program Strategy Rationale is shown in the form of an example in the
following table. (The format of Table 2, with your choices based on your decisions, is
what we want to see as your final answer for this part!)
Table 2. Program Strategy Rationale
Program Program
Strategy
Matrix Cell Rationale
Home
Health
6 – Expand
Scope,
New Target
Clients
Environmental analysis reveals that there are many areas that
have high rates of poverty, high density of aged population, and
no private or public transportation. Also, there are few health
care institutions in the area. The need is particularly acute in the
area of home health aide services.
Immuniza
tion
2 –
Contract
Scope,
Change
Focus
Many private providers now provide immunizations. Through
this system, most areas have achieved a very high
immunization rate. The Health Department is moving more
toward assurance and monitoring rather than actually doing
immunizations.
Part V—Strategy Implementation
The strategy you develop needs to be reflected by the allocation of funds to programs
and projects. To this end, you are to produce a budget for FY2018 that meets the
requirements (increase or decrease) stated in the case "The Health Department Moves
Toward Strategic Thinking."
The budget summary table (Table 3) shown below should be used to present your new
budget. This table is your final answer for this part. Please modify the
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!