Useful Tool in Reintegration Program Response to Professor
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
STUDENT REPLIES
THIS IS MY ANSWER TO THE PROFESSOR AND THE STUDENT LYDIA KELLY RESPONDED TO MY CLASS RESPONSE. SO PLEASE ANSWER HER REPLY BACK
Useful Tool in Reintegration Program Response to Professor
MY CLASS RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR I feel that shaming is a useful tool in reintegration program. I feel that if the offender is
caused to feel bad about the act publicly in an effective manor than this should be used. Should
the person carries the stigma of the shaming after that I do not believe they should, once they have
remorseful the offender should be accepted back into society this is what is reintegration
shaming. Stigmatic shaming keeps the offender out of society for the remainder of their life with
no hope of reintegration.
When it comes to John Braithwaites theory of reintegrative shaming what he did was
look at both stigmatization and reintegration shaming where he examined the difference between
these two. He saw that reintegration shaming will help to reduce crime versus the stigmatization
may encourage or increase future. Braithwaite felt that a person that committed a certain act
should be therefore shamed by their society for the act that was committed and after that bring
the person back to their society without them having to have a label such as a criminal or not
normal (Braithwaite, 1989). The offender should receive encouragement by their society to make
up for what they have done and be remorseful for the behavior learn from it than move on
(Braithwaite, 1989)
Reference:
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame, and Reintegration [E-book]. Cambridge University Press.
http://johnbraithwaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Crime-Shame-andReintegration.pdfSTUDENT #1Lydia Kelly ANSWER THIS QESTION AGAINST MY RESPONSE UP ABOVE
One of the problems I can see with shaming punishments is the mental health aspect it could cause to the offender, but also how does society forget and not treat that person differently? For instance, Jim has committed theft, he was caught and sentenced to shame reintegration. The judge has Jim stand outside the store he took items from holding a sign. Jim completes that task, comes back to society and we are supposed to move on. However, Jim walks into that specific store or any store in his town and people watch him closer, some stores have security trained to follow him when he enters the store. Situation like that I feel would happen often. I do not think that is ok either. How do you fix that?STUDENT REPLIES
STUDENT #2Angelica Moreland
Honestly using the shaming tactic is not useful to me. It kind of dehumanizes offenders. I mean if those looking down have not made a mistake, or better yet have not gotten caught making those mistakes I would like to hear from them. There must be a genuine consequence to aberrant and/or illegal behavior if the learning mechanisms are to take place. The offender being in prison for a certain amount of time and being put on community supervision is not punishment enough. I agree with Cullen and Agnes Restorative justice programs seek to restore and heal the victim, repair the damage to the community, and reintegrate offenders after they have made their commitment to the victim. I believe that assisting the offender with as much support as possible will make for a better outcome than shaming them for a certain period.REFERENCE
Hanser, R.D. (2017), Introduction to Correctionns (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication, INCSTUDENT #3 Seterial Thurman
Is shaming a useful tool in reintegration programs? Why or why not? Support your argument with professional experience and theories (e.g., Braithwaites reintegrative shaming theory) from this weeks Learning Resources.
Let me address John Braithwaite’s theory of re-integrative shaming, Braithwaithe looked at the stigmatization portion and re-integration shamin where he looked at the differences of the two. Braithwaithefelt that re-integration shaming would possibly reduce crime and stigmatization would very well encourage future crimes by the person. Braithwaithe theory saw shaming as a way to embarrass a person in public to the point they would feel bad about their actions and never wanted to commit the crime again and be remorseful for their actions.Now lets address my opinion I think in some cases shaming would work especially if they were made to be on Display in the community they lived in and they aren’t “career criminals”. Example of this a Judge Ive known for years who became a Congressman and represented the 2nd Congressional District in Texas and the would-be Ted “Judge” Poe. Judge’s approach was simple and unorthodox: He would sentence shoplifters to hold a sign in public confessing their theft or arrange for abusive spouses to apologize on the courthouse steps. He always wanted them to know there was a victim at the other end of their actions, said Elaine Stolte, who worked for Poe for nearly two decades while he was on the bench. In one case, he ordered a car thief, who stole and wrecked an elderly woman’s car, to lend her his souped-up Pontiac until her car was back from the shop. “She called me the next day and said she never had so much fun driving this Trans Am around Houston, ” Poe said. This process would work in my opinion but not sure it would work for the hardened criminal as I previously stated, it might just cause resentment towards the legal system but if you catch the first time/problem offenders it could work some places have prisoners cleaning the highways as part of their punishment or painting over graffiti.
References:
https://www.rollcall.com/2018/08/23/ted-poes-final-courtroom-drama/
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=UutOv-VP0NwC&oi=fnd&pg=PP11&dq=Braithwaite,+J.+(1989).Crime,+Shame,+and+Reintegration%5BE-book%5D.+Cambridge+University+Press&ots=DSH-sdb_SW&sig=DMrQQIH6clfc3ODXpvxtfi5l7Nw#v=onepage&q=Braithwaite%2C%20J.%20(1989).Crime%2C%20Shame%2C%20and%20Reintegration%5BE-book%5D.%20Cambridge%20University%20Press&f=false
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!