US Army Futures Command Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
US Army Futures Command Case Study
Topic: Does the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversaries?
Paper details:
Argumentative Essay Development Student Guide Development of Thesis Statement Based on the readings, does the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversaries? 1. Pick a side, i.e. do you believe it does or does not enable the Army to defeat its peer adversaries. Answer this in a succinct statement. 2. Select and name three specific facts espoused in the US Army Futures Command. Write what they are below, do not describe them at this time. a. b. c. 3. Combine your answers to questions 1 and 2 in a succinct sentence.
This is your thesis statement. Development of Introductory Paragraph 4. Select a battlefield example of a modern era threat from a peer adversary, i.e. cyber warfare from Russia. Write a sentence that names the example and a single significant fact about it. 5. Why is the example worth knowing? Answer this question in a specific succinct sentence.
This is your attention step and should motivate the reader to read your essay. Remember to specifically name your example, this lends credibility. 6. Write a sentence to introduce the US Army Futures Command. Name it and state why it is noteworthy according to expert opinion, not your own. 7.
List the facts you selected (2a, b, and c) and state whether those policies would or would not address the example you chose for 4. If you are arguing the affirmative, they should address the issue; if the negative, they should not. Write a direct statement that supports the selection you made for number 1. Answer this in a complete sentence. 8. Combine sentences 4, 5, 6, 7, and 3. This is your introductory paragraph. Development of Body Paragraph One 9. Write a sentence that identifies and defines 2a. 10. Select a specific example of a threat that would fall under this policy from one of the assigned readings.
Would the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversary in this instance? Make sure this supports the choice you made for question 1. Write a sentence that describes this instance. 11. Write a sentence that states why the action is pivotal or important. 12. Write a succinct sentence that states why this threat can or cannot be addressed by 2a. Stay true to your thesis statement–this sentence ties your argument to your thesis. Development of Body Paragraph Two 13.
Write a sentence that identifies and defines 2b. 14. Select a specific example of a threat that would fall under this policy from one of the assigned readings. Would the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversary in this instance? Make sure this supports the choice you made for question 1. Write a sentence that describes this event. 15. Write a sentence that states why the action is pivotal or important. 16.
Write a concise sentence that states why this threat can or cannot be addressed by 2b. Stay true to your thesis statement–this sentence ties your argument to your thesis. Development of Body Paragraph Three 17. Write a sentence that identifies and defines 2c. 18. Select a specific example of a threat that would fall under this policy from one of the assigned readings. Would the US Army Futures Command enable the Army to defeat its peer adversary in this instance? Make sure this supports the choice you made for question 1.
Write a sentence that describes this instance. 19. Write a sentence that states why the action is pivotal or important. 20. Write a succinct sentence that states why this threat can or cannot be addressed by 2c. Stay true to your thesis statement–this sentence ties your argument to your thesis. Development of the Conclusion 21. Based on your answer to question 1, write a sentence that states whether the US Army Futures Command is adequate for the defeat of peer adversaries. 22. Write a sentence that lists the 3 specific examples you chose in 10, 14 and 18. Do not describe them. Identify that these events are threats from specific peer adversaries. 23.
Based on how you answered question 1, write a sentence that states whether the US Army Futures Command can enable or cannot enable the defeat of peer enemies in the events in 22. 24. Write a sentence that suggests the significance of this knowledge for today’s military professional. 25. Restate your thesis using different language. Do not repeat your thesis using the same sentence. 26. Combine 22-25, this is your conclusion paragraph. Instruction: Double-space the essay with one-inch margins all around (top, bottom, left, and right) in Arial font, size 12-pitch. The paper should be three-to-five typed pages, approximately 750 – 1,250 words.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!