Uc Irvine Motion Picture News Magazine Annotated Bibliography
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Uc Irvine Motion Picture News Magazine Annotated Bibliography
Research and Bibliography Instructions
- Select a film from the list provided on Canvas. This list contains films available on
Kanopy, which you can access through your UCI library account. If you would like to
write about a film not on the list, you must get approval from your TA in advance.
However, it must be a film produced before 1930.
- You need to screen your film at least once, even if you’ve seen it before. It is
your responsibility to find a copy of your film to watch if it is not on Kanopy.
- Research: You need to find written sources about your film from the time in which
it was produced and released. These may include film reviews, interviews with the
filmmakers, advertisements, or articles about the production, premiere, theatrical
exploitation, or box office performance in industry trades.
- The best way to find these sources is through the Media History Digital
Library. You can access the search engine through: Lantern.mediahist.org.
- Enter your film title in the Search box (in “quotes” may help if the title
includes common words), then narrow the years (on the left side) to two
years before and after the release year of your film (or five years after for
international films).
- Look through the results (do not just use the first eight that come up!). You
need to find a variety of sources. Eight advertisements or eight box office
reports is not good research. You should find a mix of ads, articles,
interviews, industry reports, and reviews.
- When you find one that looks interesting, click “Read in Context.” This will
open the magazine, though the page may be wrong. You often have to flip
back a page or two to find the right one.
- If you are not finding enough quality sources:
- Try searching the star or director of your film.
- Focus on one of the ‘Collections’ such as ‘Fan Magazines’ or ‘Technical
Journals.’
iii. For international films, you will need to search up to five years after
the release year since they often take time to be released in the U.S.
They may also have been released under alternate titles.
- Citation: When you find a source you want to use, you should download or take a
snapshot of, as it will need to be included with your bibliography submission.
- You then collect the citation information, including all of the following that yu
can find:
- Article title
- Article author (there may not be one)
iii. Page number (If it’s not listed on the page, use a nearby page to
deduce the page number.)
- Periodical title (i.e. Daily Variety, Motion Picture News)
- The date of publication (Likely at the top or bottom of the page.)
- The volume and issue number (You will likely need to flip to the
editorial page at the front of the periodical to find this.)
- Sample Citation:
John Leezer, “To Be or Not to Be?” American Cinematographer II, no. 10
(May 12, 1921): 2.
or
Author, “Title” Periodical Name Volume, no. Issue (Date): Page Number.
- Annotation: In your bibliography, you will then annotate each citation. This will
show that you have read your sources and know what they will add to your paper.
- In order to annotate properly, you need to know what publication you are
using. On the search listing, you can click on the periodical title, such as
“Motion Picture Daily.” This will take you to a page with “Book/Volume
Details.” At the bottom should be a “Description” that tells you about the
publication and its intended audience.
- Annotation Example: “This is a review of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari from a
major American trade paper aimed at exhibitors. It shows how American
critics liked but did not understand the film or its potential to connect with
audiences.”
- It must include all of the following, preferably as a single pdf:
- A list of at least eight (we recommend 12) properly cited primary
sources.
- 1-2 sentence annotations under each source entry.
iii. Copies of each of the sources.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!