U.S. Attempt to Combat Al Qaeda
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
U.S. Attempt to Combat Al Qaeda
Module Three due 10/27:
This module’s lecture considers the various ways the U.S. has attempted to combat al Qaeda, insurgent forces, and the Islamic State. These methods include: conventional warfare (occupying territory and attempting to fight enemy forces in a traditional manner, while not focusing much on the local society); Counterinsurgency (COIN/the Petraeus Doctrine); and Counter-Terrorism (use of SOF, drones, and air strikes).
For this discussion board, critically think about these methods of combating these threats, including their strengths and weaknesses in relation to specific threats as well as how well these methods have worked so far. In doing so, discuss what sort of strategy you believe the United States should adopt in combating the Islamic State and al Qaeda. Should the U.S. adopt the same strategy for both threats, or a different strategy for each threat? What sort of footprint should U.S. forces have “on the ground” and to what extent should the U.S. work with others (such as countries within the region as well as other Western powers) to combat these threats? What is your sense of the effectiveness of the current U.S. strategy in combatting the Islamic State
Module Four due 11/3:
This module’s lecture focused on an important aspect of the current U.S. strategy (as much as we can say a true strategy exists in a formal sense) in combating international terrorist threats: the use of UAVs to eliminate these threats. From Afghanistan and Iraq to Yemen, Syria, and other countries, drones are increasingly relied upon to eliminate these threats. However, the increasing use of drones does raise certain concerns. Such concerns include issues of sovereignty, civilian casualties, and even whether a strategy relying upon drones in conjunction with SOF (rather than large numbers of “boots on the ground,” for instance) is the best option for combating threats like al Qaeda and the Islamic State.
For this module’s discussion board, consider these concerns and the overall costs and benefits of drone strikes. Do you think these concerns are valid? Why or why not? What about the benefits of using drones (such as keeping pilots out of harms way, the ability to conduct surveillance of specific threats, the ability to strike targets with high levels of precision, and so on)? Do your views differ when considering the specific threat, such as al Qaeda versus the Islamic State? Feel free to relate this discussion to your overall thoughts on U.S. strategy in combating terrorist threats as well as any knowledge you have about the use of drones from government or media reporting.
Module Five due 11/10:
In this module, we have begun to discuss some of the United States’ changes and responses to national security concerns after September 11, 2001. So far, we have looked at both domestic issues, such as increased surveillance of U.S. citizens, and international issues, such as rendition and the use of enhanced interrogation.
For this discussion board, assess these post-9/11 changes. Do you agree with actions the U.S. has taken? Explain why or why not. You may find that you agree with some of the actions and not others. You might also have your own suggestions on actions the U.S. should be taking to improve national security and protect against future terrorist attacks. If so, feel free to share your ideas.
Though this discussion board is very open-ended, be sure to give your responses serious thought.
Module Six due 11/17:
Our topic this module builds upon the discussion we started in the last module. Specifically, we look towards the tension that exists between Freedom and Security. Based on what we covered this module and last, assess the questions posed toward the end of this module’s lecture. These questions include: Are the actions taken by the government since 9/11, including increased domestic surveillance, a threat to freedom? Is it problematic that many of these actions were undertaken in secret? Has the balance between security and freedom shifted too far towards security? Should we willingly give up some freedom for greater security? Should we accept a certain level of insecurity in a free society?
In considering these questions, feel free to elaborate upon your own general thoughts beyond these questions as well. Information from the assigned readings may also prove useful in supporting your views
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!