Transnational Legal Compliance and International Standards
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Transnational Legal Compliance and International Standards
Your team has been given the responsibility of conducting a baseline analysis for establishing a secure communications network for your assigned agency at the summit. The risk assessment process for a baseline analysis requires a multidisciplinary examination of the internal and external cyber environments.
The graded assignment for Project 1 is a Cybersecurity Policy and Baseline Analysis Report, which should be a minimum of 20 pages. There are 16 steps in this project and it should take about 17 days to complete.
This project is longer in duration than others in the course because some of the work you will complete also lays the foundation for work to be completed in Projects 2, 3, and 4. Begin with Step 1, where you will complete preparatory exercises designed to familiarize you with the tools and processes to be used throughout the project.
This is what I will be working on as a team member of this project: Step 14, 15, and 16.
- Based on the policy matrix and the environmental review and analysis you developed in previous steps; the team should provide a two- to three-page Transnational Legal Compliance Report that itemizes all of the compliance requirements that are overlapping or similar among all the nations on the cyber security task force for the conference.
Include a short analysis on how these requirements are consistent (or not) with the Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to the Conduct of Cyber Operations.
In accordance with your team agreement, a designated team member will submit the Digital Forensic Environment Review and Analysis and the Transnational Legal Compliance Report to the drop box.
Then, proceed to the next step in the project to identify the critical or key international standards determined in previous steps.
- Now that you have looked at the regulations used by the other nations, in this step you will consider international initiatives that foster cooperation with each other.
Among the items identified in the Transnational Legal Compliance Report and the policy matrix from the previous steps are certain international initiatives that each country has undertaken to demonstrate cooperation and compliance with other nations.
From the information you have gathered and what you have learned in previous courses, determine as a team which of these initiatives provides the best opportunity for cooperation among all the delegates at the conference.
Your team should develop a two- to three-page International Standards Report. Then, in accordance with your team agreement, a designated team member will submit the report for feedback. State your sources and support your recommendations with the facts that have been gathered.
- As a team, you will work together to create a Cybersecurity Policy and Baseline Analysis Report. This report will address the current cyber disposition of legal standing for the Five Eyes (FVEY) country you represent regarding international cyber relations. This final report will be a minimum of 20 pages in length and meet APA standards for writing.
Refer to the Cybersecurity Policy and Baseline Analysis Report Instructions for further details of what to include and the general format of the report. After you have collaborated with your team, each team member should make revisions and submit an individual report, independent of the team. Submit your Cybersecurity Policy and Baseline Analysis Report for assessment.
Five Eyes Alliance
The United States, in cooperation with the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand established an agreement known as the Five Eyes (FVEY) alliance under which these countries agree to both collect, analyze, and share signals intelligence (SIGINT) and not spy on each other as adversaries (Mansfield, 2017).
The members of FVEY use their technical capabilities to collect massive amounts of information on electronic communications world-wide, to target specific individuals and groups, and to retain information about other persons for extended periods of time. This data is collected at “Special Source Operations” (SSO) locations around the globe and stored in the Five Eyes nations’ databases (Parsons, 2015).
Signals intelligence surveillance plays a critical role in the United States’ cybersecurity and cyber-offense approaches. Its cybersecurity posture is dependent upon the ability to protect and defend communications networks from infiltration, manipulation, and exploitation by adversaries both foreign and domestic.
The use of deep packet inspection equipment throughout global networks allows the United States and the other FVEY members to collect metadata and content, and very intricate signals development operations enable access to, infiltration of, and modification of data on the networks of adversaries as part of their cyber-offensive strategies.
Once targets are identified, the SIGINT agencies can then identify groups and their relationships with the adversary under surveillance through the development of communications association graphs. Data collected are analyzed and filtered to examine information that may assist in a specific SIGINT operation. This data can then be used to further target specific individuals and to exploit and manipulate their devices, systems, and/or networks (Parsons, 2015).
One of the more difficult aspects of the FYVE relationship is that of the sharing of intelligence data. Disclosure of the intelligence data isn’t as much of a concern as inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures that put methods, sources, and platforms for intelligence collection at risk.
While military commanders have long pushed for a common interface for actionable intelligence that can be using in operations planning, intelligence and political leaders have resisted the broadening of intelligence sharing databases due to concerns about endangering their individual nations’ assets (Erwin, 2015).
References
Erwin, S. (2015, September). U.S. Central Command leads push to connect allies in common network. National Defense, C(742), 20-21. (Accession no. 109203109).
Mansfield, H. (2017, April 1). Using VPNs to protect your Internet privacy. Retrieved from https://haroldmansfield.com/using-a-vpn-to-protect…
Parsons, C. (2015, 23 March). Beyond privacy: Articulating the broader harms of pervasive mass surveillance. Media and Communications, 3(3), 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunicatio…
RESOURCES
UK Perspective
Australian Perspective
New Zealand Perspective
US Perspective
Canadian Perspective
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Transnational Legal Compliance and International Standards
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!