Transformational Leadership Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Week 6 Discussion: Transformational Leadership (graded)
Purpose
The graded topic for this week is related to the following Course Outcome: (CO).CO2: Proposes leadership and cooperation solutions for managing care and/or assigning tasks for health promotion, sickness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities with consumers and other healthcare professionals. (PO#2)
Discussion
Transformational leaders have the ability to change the culture of a unit or organization by influencing others around them. Please respond to the following questions:Write down a summary of your basic views on what makes a good leader.
How do you believe others see your leadership style in terms of the transformational leadership abilities highlighted in our mandatory article reading?
Which of the TEACH ideals presented in the class do you believe would have the greatest impact on your workplace if implemented?
GradingPlease click on the three dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and choose Show Rubric to see the grading criteria/rubric.
Discussion Board Rubric 9_19
Discussion Board Rubric 9_19Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answers the initial graded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.
16.0 pts
Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.14.0 pts
Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.12.0 pts
Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.0.0 pts
Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s). 16.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited. ( APA format not required)
12.0 pts
Integrates evidence to support your discussion from: assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.10.0 pts
Integrates evidence to support discussion from: assigned readings OR online lesson. Sources are credited.9.0 pts
Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.0.0 pts
Does not integrate any evidence. 12.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.
14.0 pts
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.12.0 pts
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.10.0 pts
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.0.0 pts
No response post to another student or instructor. 14.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates in a professional manner.
8.0 pts
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).7.0 pts
Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).6.0 pts
Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).0.0 pts
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). 8.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome PARTICIPATION: Response to initial question:
Responds to initial discussion question(s) by
Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
0.0 pts
0 points deductedStudent posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.0.0 pts
5 points deductedStudent does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT. 0.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome PARTICIPATION Total posts:
Participates in the discussion at least three times on at least two different days.
0.0 pts
0 points deductedPosts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.0.0 pts
5 points deductedPosts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days. 0.0 pts Total Points: 50.0
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!