Trait Theorists and Neo-Freudians Discussion Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Trait Theorists and Neo-Freudians Discussion Paper
QUESTION 1 (33 P0INTS)
In the space below:
1a. How do Trait Theorists and Neo-Freudians differ in their explanations of Personality? (About 100 words).
1b. What common explanations of Personality do Freudians and Behaviorists share? (About 100 words).
1c. How do Humanists utilize Cognitivist theory principles in counseling patients? (100 words)
QUESTION (33 POINTS)
In the space below:
2a. How might Behaviorists and Humanists differ in their treatment of anger? (about100 words)
2b. Explain why Freud’s theories are still relevant today? (About 100 words).
2c. What do Biologists say about the importance of 2 topics: genetics, and the extravert-introvert question. (100 words)
QUESTION 3 (33 POINTS)
In the space below:
3a. From a Cognitivist perspective, explain the behavior of one person you have observed. (100 words)
3b. From a Behaviorist perspective, explain the behavior of a second person you have observed. (100 words)
3c From a Freudian perspective, explain the behavior of a third person you have observed. (100 words)
(About 100 words).
QUESTION 4 (31 POINTS)
In the space below:
4a. Take and complete one I PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT that is in your textbook. Name the test and describe its methodology and assumptions. (About 100 words).
4b. Identify and explain one concept or principle that the test is supposed to measure or illustrate,
in words that you think a relative or colleague could understand. (About 100 words).
4c. Rate this Assessment (low 1 to 10 high) for 1. Its Reliability and 2. Its Validity. Explain your answer. (About 100 words).
DIRECTIONS:
- Label the 12 sections: “1a.” through “4c”.
- Confine your answers to the correct sections.
ISSC457 Week 1 Assignment
Name: _________________________ Date: _____________
Fill in your name above, put your full response below each question, save the file using the file naming convention: “ISSC457_Week1_Assignment_LastName_FirstName.doc” where LastName is your last name and FirstName is your first name, then return this document for grading.
Upon completing lesson 1 reading, you should be able to provide information regarding the below question.
Assignment Rubric ( 100 Points)
Synthesis of Concepts 60 Writing Standards – APA format 20 Timeliness 20
- What do you understand about remote logging?
- Explain Linux process accounting.
Beginning of Draft Part 2
Emerging Issue: Cybercrime
Cybercrime is the use of a computer as an instrument to further illegal ends, these attacks may not do physical harm to the body but can negatively affect the virtual appearance of a person or corporation (Dennis, 2019). Since the 1980s, cybercrime has influenced the act of espionage, the creation of viruses, and high-profile breaches (Chadd, 2020).
The types of cybercriminals have also evolved over time. Cybercriminals include, but are not limited to, professional hackers, information traffickers, and fraudsters (STANCU, 2020). Even though antivirus software now exist, cyberthreats will continue to be an issue in the tech industry.
Theme: Antivirus Software flaws
According to Zaharia, over 75-percent of large companies rely on antivirus software that came pre-installed on their computer equipment, which may not be the most effective countermeasure (Zaharia, 2022).
There are thousands of antivirus software that can be downloaded, and protection levels vary. Brands such as McAfee and Norton are popular, but one may work better with Windows compared to macOS and may have a higher price point. The number of choices and various ways to obtain antivirus software provide cybercriminals opportunities to strike. Cybercriminals mimic antivirus companies and make fake antivirus suites that can be downloaded just as trustworthy options can.
For example, AntiVirus Pro 2017, AVLab Internet Security, Antivirus 10 and many others imitate computer scans and state that the computer is infected with high-risk malware which forces the user to pay for more protection, in turn, generating revenue for the developers (Meskauskas, 2021). The victims can report cyber scams and antivirus companies eventually improve their methods, but cybercriminals continue to find ways to perform attacks because their motivators remain the same: financial gain and power.
Theme: Cybercriminal Motivators
With data being stored all over the world daily, cybercriminals know they have the tools to easily access personal, financial, or health information and monetize them on underground black markets (Ablon, 2018). They also have the options of charging businesses to get their data back or an individual directly.
Keeper states, cybercriminals can make three-thousand-five-hundred dollars to one-hundred-sixty-six dollars per month. They can also stay anonymous and retrieve payments through bitcoin, a digital currency. Keeper believes, the incentives for stealing this data and then selling it to the highest bidders will remain in place for the foreseeable future (Keeper, 2018).
I may add more information on motivators to emphasis the power aspect mentioned in the last paragraph.
Conclusion
Here, I’ll make comments about the importance of artificial intelligence, data security, and risk management and the vulnerability by including the threat of cybercriminals. This will allow me to tie everything back into data analytics and the present the idea that the tech industry will prevail but threats will still remain.
References
Currently revising
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!