The sociology of online privacy and the right to be forgotten

July 18, 2023

The sociology of online privacy and the right to be forgotten

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

The sociology of online privacy and the right to be forgotten

Introduction:

The advent of the internet and digital technologies has transformed the way we communicate, access information, and interact with one another. However, it has also raised significant concerns about online privacy. This essay explores the sociology of online privacy and the right to be forgotten, focusing on the social implications of digital surveillance, data collection, and individuals’ control over their personal information in the online realm.

Digital Surveillance and Privacy:

Digital surveillance refers to the monitoring, tracking, and collection of individuals’ online activities and personal information. Online platforms, government agencies, and corporations collect vast amounts of data, which can have far-reaching implications for privacy. Sociologically, this raises questions about power dynamics, social control, and the balance between individual rights and collective interests.

The Impact of Data Collection on Social Life:

The pervasive collection of personal data has implications for social life in several ways. It can lead to the erosion of privacy boundaries, blurring the distinction between public and private realms. Individuals may alter their behavior, self-censor, or curtail their online activities due to the awareness of constant surveillance. This can affect self-expression, freedom of speech, and the formation of online communities.

Social Sorting and Discrimination:

The use of personal data for profiling and targeting individuals can perpetuate social sorting and discrimination. Algorithms and data-driven decision-making processes can reinforce existing social inequalities, limit opportunities, and lead to unfair treatment. Socioeconomic status, race, gender, and other social identities can become factors that shape individuals’ access to resources, opportunities, and their overall online experience.

The Right to be Forgotten:

The right to be forgotten refers to individuals’ ability to have their personal information removed or de-indexed from online platforms, search engines, and databases. This right recognizes individuals’ autonomy and control over their own digital footprints. It allows individuals to protect their privacy, preserve their reputation, and move beyond past mistakes or irrelevant information that may harm their personal and professional lives.

Social Implications and Challenges:

Implementing the right to be forgotten poses various challenges and raises important sociological questions. Balancing individuals’ rights to privacy and freedom of expression requires careful considerations. There is a need to strike a balance between protecting privacy and ensuring that information relevant to public interest or historical records is preserved.

Moreover, the right to be forgotten raises concerns about censorship, the rewriting of history, and the potential for abuse. Societal debates are necessary to establish guidelines, policies, and legal frameworks that protect individual rights while maintaining the integrity of public discourse and access to information.

Collective Responsibility and Ethical Frameworks:

Addressing the sociology of online privacy and the right to be forgotten requires collective responsibility and the establishment of ethical frameworks. Governments, technology companies, and civil society organizations should collaborate to develop transparent practices, clear guidelines, and policies that protect individuals’ privacy and ensure accountability for data handling and storage.

Education and Digital Literacy:

Promoting digital literacy and education about online privacy is crucial for empowering individuals to navigate the digital landscape effectively. Educating individuals about their rights, providing tools for safeguarding personal information, and fostering critical thinking skills can enhance individuals’ control over their digital identities and privacy.

Conclusion:

The sociology of online privacy and the right to be forgotten raises significant societal and ethical considerations. Balancing the benefits of digital connectivity with individuals’ rights to privacy and control over personal information is a complex task. By recognizing the social implications of digital surveillance, data collection, and the right to be forgotten, we can work towards a more inclusive, transparent, and privacy-respecting digital society.

The sociology of online privacy and the right to be forgotten

RUBRIC

QUALITY OF RESPONSE	NO RESPONSE	POOR / UNSATISFACTORY	SATISFACTORY	GOOD	EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.	30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.	40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.	50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).	Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.	5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6^th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.	10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6^th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.	15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.	20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors	10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors	15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.	20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6^th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6^th edition requirements whatsoever.	5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6^th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper	7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.	10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6^th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!