The Self-Defense Forces of Japan
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Based on Jeff Kingston’s Japan in Transformation, 1945-2010 2nd Edition, the articles listed below, and Japan’s About Face video, https://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/video/japans-about-face-video-full-episode/1641/, (This is a link to another website.)
In a 3-5 page paper, please respond to the following questions. Please notice that the film is divided into seven parts, each lasting approximately 50 minutes. You’ll have to click on each one separately. You’ll be asked if PBS is your local station before seeing the video; you should say yes.Which internal and foreign policy issues prevent Japan from rethinking the Self-Defense Force’s role?
What internal and global policy reasons are causing Japan’s pacifist identity to be questioned?
Each day that a paper is late, it receives a half-grade reduction. For whatever reason, no documents will be accepted beyond Friday, May 21st at 11:59 p.m.
Because this is not a research paper, please only use the sources listed in the module for the paper assignment. After the quoted line, cite the video in parenthesis with the time from the specific frame. ( PBS 2008 00:52, Japan’s About Face). A unique page number is required for text and article citations. After each reference, the proper citation format is indicated. In the paper assignment module, you’ll find the sources.The Sea Change in Japanese Foreign Policy, NBR Analysis Brief, June 17, 2014, 1-2. Kenneth B. Pyle, The Sea Change in Japanese Foreign Policy, NBR Analysis Brief, June 17, 2014, 1-2. (Pyle, 2017, p.
Ten Myths About Japan’s Collective Self-Defense Change, The Diplomat, July 10, 2014. Michael Green and Jeffrey W. Hornung, Ten Myths About Japan’s Collective Self-Defense Change, The Diplomat, July 10, 2014. (Page, Green and Hornun 2014)
Foreign Affairs, March/April 2016, Michael Auslin, “Japan’s New Realism.” (Auslin, 2016, p.
“Japan’s Security Policy Reform: Institutional Changes Facilitating a Greater Role in Regional Security,” by Marta Ross, published in March 2017. (Ross 2017, page)“How Japan Is Upgrading Its Military,” Sheila Smith, 24 February 2021, https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/how-japan-upgrading-its-military (This is a link to another website.) (Smith, 2101.)
Appropriate Citation
Each time you quote from the text, make sure to cite it. After the punctuation mark, cite the author and page number in (Larus 2020, p. 12).
Because you must refer to a specific point in the text, you should not mention more than 1-2 pages at a time in any one reference. For instance, (Larus 2020, 42-43) is OK, while (Larus 2020, 42-52) is not.You can never have too many references to the book or film, but failing to cite the content correctly will significantly lower your score.
You must use a direct quote if you use the author’s precise words. This should only happen in the case of brief sections of 1-2 sentences. Ex:
For Mao, it was not only a question of adapting Marxism, but sinicizing itgiving it Chinese traits by enhancing it with components drawn from China’s experience, writes Elizabeth Larus. (Page 48 of Larus 2020).
You must still mention the relevant passage in the text if you paraphrase (restate the author’s point in your own words).
For example, Elizabeth Larus explains how Mao combined Marxism with aspects of Chinese culture. (Larus, p. 48, 2020)
All papers will be examined for plagiarism and proper citation. Students who do not correctly cite the sources they use can expect to lose at least half of their mark. Students who plagiarize a paper (specified in the curriculum) will receive a failing grade in the course.
I received an F on my first assignment, and my professor commented, “This paper is overly broad, and it appears that you only saw the first few minutes of the movie. The civil war is the only event you address, and you were required to bring in the relevant text. The Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution were two more events that should have been covered. The costs and benefits needed considerably more explanation, and a distinct conclusion should have been included. Because Chinese names are spelled with the last name first, Zhang is Yimou’s last name. Therefore you should refer to him as Zhang Yimou or Zhang Yimou.”
I got a similar response from her again on the second paper, “On question 2, you made some nice points, but you needed to expand on the beneficial impact of technology. Question 1 is missing consideration of the political barriers, such as limits on environmental NGOs and local governments’ reliance on polluting factory tax income. Question 3 is perplexing. You needed to discuss rural-urban inequality in the text first and then determine how the environment affects this discrepancy. For example, rural populations are relocated in the water diversion project so that that water can flow to northern metropolitan regions. Rural citizens face the costs of urban upgrades, which is a major contradiction given that rural people were responsible for the country’s communist victory.”
Please keep that in mind.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!