The Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Criminal Behavior
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
The Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Criminal Behavior
The nature vs. nurture debate in criminal behavior refers to the ongoing discussion about the relative importance of an individual’s genetic or inherited characteristics versus environmental and social factors in the development of criminal behavior. Those who support the nature perspective argue that genetics play a significant role in determining an individual’s likelihood to engage in criminal behavior, while those who support the nurture perspective argue that environmental and social factors, such as poverty, family dynamics, and exposure to violence, are more important.
One of the strongest arguments for the nature perspective is the existence of genetic conditions that have been linked to criminal behavior. For example, some studies have found that individuals with certain genetic variations are more likely to engage in violent and impulsive behavior, leading to criminal acts. Additionally, twin studies have demonstrated a significant genetic component in criminal behavior, with identical twins being more likely to both engage in criminal behavior than fraternal twins.
However, many criminologists argue that the nature vs. nurture debate is not a simple matter of either nature or nurture, but rather a complex interplay between the two. For example, an individual who has a genetic predisposition to criminal behavior may be more likely to engage in criminal behavior if they are exposed to certain environmental and social factors. Additionally, research has shown that even if genetics play a role in criminal behavior, they are not deterministic, as many individuals with similar genetic profiles do not engage in criminal behavior.
One of the strongest arguments for the nurture perspective is the high correlation between poverty and criminal behavior. Individuals living in poverty are more likely to experience environmental and social stressors, such as high crime rates, drug use, and exposure to violence, which can increase the likelihood of criminal behavior. Additionally, research has shown that family dynamics, such as neglect or abuse, can increase the risk of criminal behavior.
Critics of the nurture perspective argue that it fails to take into account the many individuals who are exposed to similar environmental and social stressors but do not engage in criminal behavior. This suggests that other factors, such as genetics, may also play a role.
Despite the ongoing debate, it is clear that both nature and nurture play a role in criminal behavior. For example, genetic predispositions may increase an individual’s likelihood to engage in criminal behavior, but environmental and social factors can exacerbate or mitigate this risk. Additionally, the interplay between nature and nurture is complex, and can vary depending on individual and situational factors.
The nature vs. nurture debate in criminal behavior has important implications for criminal justice policy. If genetics play a significant role in criminal behavior, this may support the use of predictive technologies, such as genetic testing, to identify individuals who are at risk of engaging in criminal behavior. However, this could also raise ethical concerns about the use of such technologies and the potential for discrimination and stigmatization of individuals based on their genetic profiles.
On the other hand, if environmental and social factors are more important, this may support policy initiatives that address the root causes of criminal behavior, such as poverty, family dynamics, and exposure to violence. This could include initiatives aimed at reducing poverty, providing support for families and individuals, and creating safer and more stable communities.
In conclusion, the nature vs. nurture debate in criminal behavior highlights the complexity and interplay of factors that contribute to criminal behavior. Both nature and nurture play a role, but the precise interplay between the two is complex and varies depending on individual and situational factors. Understanding the nature vs. nurture debate is important for developing effective criminal justice policies that address the root causes of criminal behavior and promote public safety.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
The Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Criminal Behavior
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!