The Impact of Agricultural Trade on Food Security
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
The Impact of Agricultural Trade on Food Security
Agricultural trade refers to the exchange of agricultural products and services between countries. It is an essential component of the global economy and has significant impacts on food security. The impact of agricultural trade on food security can be both positive and negative, depending on the nature of the trade, the policies governing it, and the conditions of the countries involved.
On the positive side, agricultural trade can promote food security by providing access to a range of food products that are not available domestically. It can also improve the availability and affordability of food products, reduce food prices, and increase food diversity. Additionally, agricultural trade can provide economic benefits, such as increased employment opportunities, foreign exchange earnings, and investment opportunities in the agricultural sector.
On the negative side, agricultural trade can threaten food security by reducing local production and limiting access to food for vulnerable populations. It can also lead to environmental degradation, food safety risks, and negative health impacts, especially in countries that lack effective regulatory systems. Furthermore, agricultural trade can reinforce the dominance of large-scale agribusinesses over smallholder farmers, leading to increased inequality and social exclusion.
The impact of agricultural trade on food security is complex and depends on various factors, including:
- Domestic production: The extent to which a country can produce its own food has a significant impact on its food security. If a country relies heavily on food imports, it is vulnerable to fluctuations in global food prices and supply disruptions. However, if a country is self-sufficient in food production, it may not benefit from agricultural trade.
- Trade policies: The policies governing agricultural trade can have a significant impact on food security. Trade policies that prioritize domestic production, protect small-scale farmers, and promote food security can have positive impacts. Conversely, policies that prioritize exports, reduce support for small-scale farmers, and increase food prices can have negative impacts.
- Food safety and quality standards: The adoption of food safety and quality standards in agricultural trade can protect consumers from health risks and ensure the quality of food products. However, these standards can also limit access to food products and increase food prices, particularly for vulnerable populations.
- Environmental impacts: Agricultural trade can have significant environmental impacts, including deforestation, land degradation, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. These impacts can threaten food security by reducing the availability and productivity of agricultural land.
To ensure that agricultural trade promotes food security, it is essential to adopt a balanced approach that recognizes the potential benefits and risks. This approach should involve:
- Supporting domestic production: Promoting domestic food production through investments in agricultural research, rural infrastructure, and smallholder farmers can enhance food security and reduce reliance on food imports.
- Promoting trade policies that prioritize food security: Trade policies should prioritize food security, protect smallholder farmers, and ensure that vulnerable populations have access to affordable and nutritious food products.
- Encouraging sustainable agricultural practices: Encouraging sustainable agricultural practices, including the adoption of agroecological approaches, can enhance food security and reduce the environmental impacts of agricultural trade.
- Adopting effective regulatory systems: Adopting effective food safety and quality standards can protect consumers from health risks and ensure that food products meet quality standards.
In conclusion, the impact of agricultural trade on food security is complex and depends on various factors. Agricultural trade can promote food security by improving the availability and affordability of food products and providing economic benefits. However, it can also threaten food security by reducing local production, limiting access to food for vulnerable populations, and contributing to environmental degradation. By adopting a balanced approach that prioritizes domestic production, trade policies that prioritize food security, sustainable agricultural practices, and effective regulatory systems, we can ensure that agricultural trade promotes food security for all.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
The Impact of Agricultural Trade on Food Security
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!