The Hofstede Insights Country Comparison Tool Essay
Order ID
53563633773
Type
Essay
Writer Level
Masters
Style
APA
Sources/References
4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order
5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
The Hofstede Insights Country Comparison Tool Essay
Personally, and professionally, we are all bound to interact with people who have cultural and experiential backgrounds that are different from our own. These differences result in different perspectives, different styles of decision making, and different communication styles and expectations. Personally, developing intercultural competence is good choice, especially if you like to travel to different regions or countries. But cultural competence becomes integral at a professional level, where you will be expected to work with clients, colleagues, organizations, manufacturers, businesses, and industry leaders with world views and expectations that are different from yours.
The first step in understanding human and cultural diversity is to identify and learn about your own culture and to consider how your cultural orientation affects your perspectives, expectations, and communication style. This assignment is designed to help students look inward and analyze their own understandings, preferences, biases, and perspectives.
Purpose
To develop an understanding of your own cultural background so that you can more fully understand the driving factors behind:
Your communication preferences and expectations
Your perspective and world view
Your expectations of others
Your professional attitudes, preferences, and communication
Your personal and professional interactions with other
Objectives
This assignment achieves the following GenEd Human and Cultural Diversity assessment objective:
Satisfactory: Student identifies and recognizes new perspectives about own cultural rules/biases.
Exceeds Expectations: Student articulates insights into own cultural rules/biases.
If you spent your childhood in more than one country, choose the country you feel was most formative/that you most identify with
If your country is not listed, choose a country that you understand to be very culturally similar. For example, some students from small countries/nations may not find their country listed, but may find that another country with a similar country is listed (for example, small countries that are often referred to in clusters, such as some islands)
Read the analysis generated below the search bar
You must click on the “Read More About Chosen Countries” button below the chart that appears to see the full analysis
You will use this analysis to answer the questions in the Cultural Communication Analysis document provided for you
Public Deliberation as Essential Career Skills Discussion
Before you write this 3-paragraph discussion post, consider what job you would like to have in ten years. Try and find a job ad that comes as close as possible to the job you are considering. Next, try and find a job that you would like when you graduate. Make sure the job is giving you the experience you need to get the job you want in ten years. Copy and paste each job ad into the discussion board. You can also take a picture of it and attach it that way.
Now, you will write about these job ads and you’re reading this week (Carcasson). In this week’s reading, Carcasson defines wicked problems. In your first paragraph, define and explain the concept of wicked problems (make sure to cite and quote the article). In this same paragraph, illustrate a wicked problem from your own life or from something you read about recently. Make sure you explain how your example illustrates the different components of a wicked problem.
In your next paragraph, describe the skill sets that Carcasson explains that communication majors develop in their curriculum that give them a head start as leaders who are able to address difficult problems with diverse groups (making sure to quote/cite his article in your post). In this same paragraph, list the classes you have taken (even if you are not a communication major) that you believe will help you in this course. Additionally, explain two concepts from any of your other courses that you think inform your ability to help address challenging issues with diverse groups.
In your final paragraph, take a look at the job ads you are posting and consider the following additional questions:
(1) Why would you need to work with others to solve problems in the career you found in your ten-year job ad? (For example, would you need ways to motivate people to work together as a team? Why? Or, would you need ways to get input from people you work with?)
(2) In light of the online lecture you watched “Public Deliberation: Essential Career Skills,” how are dialogue and deliberation skills important to either of the job ads you posted?
The Hofstede Insights Country Comparison Tool Essay
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
The Hofstede Insights Country Comparison Tool Essay
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!