The Evolution of NFTs in Kenya

The Evolution of NFTs in Kenya

Description/Paper Instructions

The Evolution of NFTs in Kenya: A Timeline

NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) are a digital asset that is used to represent ownership of unique items such as art, music, and collectibles. They have become a popular way for artists to monetize their digital creations, and their popularity has been steadily growing in Kenya as well. Here is a timeline of the evolution of NFTs in Kenya:

2017-2018: The first NFTs were created during this period, but they were not widely known or used in Kenya at this time.

2019: Interest in NFTs started to grow in Kenya, with some artists experimenting with creating their own tokens to sell their digital artwork.

March 2020: The Kenyan government announced that it was developing a blockchain-based platform to manage land registration. This was seen as a significant development in the adoption of blockchain technology in Kenya.

August 2020: Kenyan artist Trevor Maingi became the first Kenyan artist to sell an NFT. He created an NFT of one of his digital artworks, which sold for 0.25 ETH (approximately $60 at the time).

November 2020: The Kenyan government announced that it was exploring the use of blockchain technology to manage the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.

December 2020: A Kenyan artist collective called AfriNFT was formed, with the aim of promoting the use of NFTs among African artists. They held their first NFT art exhibition in Nairobi, showcasing works by Kenyan and other African artists.

January 2021: Kenyan artist Shine Tani became the first Kenyan artist to sell an NFT for over $1,000. He created an NFT of a digital artwork called “Tribal Markings,” which sold for 0.3 ETH (approximately $1,200 at the time).

February 2021: The Kenyan government announced that it was exploring the use of blockchain technology to manage the distribution of social welfare payments.

March 2021: Kenyan artist Michael Soi created an NFT of a digital artwork called “The Kiss,” which sold for 0.75 ETH (approximately $1,500 at the time). This was one of the highest-priced NFTs sold by a Kenyan artist at the time.

April 2021: The Kenyan government announced that it was developing a blockchain-based platform to manage the distribution of public funds.

May 2021: Kenyan artist Boniface Maina created an NFT of a digital artwork called “Rebirth,” which sold for 1.5 ETH (approximately $3,500 at the time). This was one of the highest-priced NFTs sold by a Kenyan artist at the time.

June 2021: The Kenyan government announced that it was developing a blockchain-based platform to manage the distribution of remittances.

July 2021: Kenyan artist Paul Onditi created an NFT of a digital artwork called “Rapture,” which sold for 2 ETH (approximately $4,500 at the time). This was one of the highest-priced NFTs sold by a Kenyan artist at the time.

August 2021: The Kenyan government announced that it was developing a blockchain-based platform to manage the distribution of tax refunds.

September 2021: The use of NFTs in Kenya continued to grow, with more artists and creators using them to sell their digital creations. The Kenyan government also continued to explore the use of blockchain technology in various sectors.

In conclusion, the evolution of NFTs in Kenya has been relatively recent, with interest in these digital assets starting to grow in 2019. Since then, Kenyan artists have been experimenting with creating and selling their own NFTs, and the Kenyan government has

The Evolution of NFTs in Kenya

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!