The Case of Little Hans Application for Clinical Psychology
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Case of Little Hans Application for Clinical Psychology
1Running head: Application of Clinical Psychology: The Case of Little Hans Application for Clinical Psychology: The Case of Little Hans Mental disorders can come in many shapes and sizes. As you will see in the case study of Little Hans, actions that may not be thought of as a problem, could be affecting a child or person without even noticing. It is imperative that a person make note and be able to identify where the core source of an issue is coming from.
Specific to this case, anxiety plays a key role in Hans problem and we will look into the biological, psychological, and social factors that led up to his issues. The Case of Little Hans. According to the biopsychosocial approach, connections between individuals€™ genetic disposition (biology), personality and mental health (psychology), and sociocultural environment (social setting) add to their experience of health or illness (Plante, 2011).
With the case of Little Hans, Sigmund Freud inferred that Little Hans encompassed a sexual desire for his biological mother, and when his biological father prohibited this behavior, Hansa€™ sexual desire for his mother transformed into anxiety (Meyer, Chapman, & Weaver, 2009). The anxiety that Little Hans was feeling was the reason for him to stay closer to his mother.
Scared that his father would slice off Hansa€™s penis if his wishes were identified, Hans conveyed his fear of his father to distress of the mere sight or thought of horses. At the age of 5, Hans had developed a nervous disorder (Meyer et al., 2009). He feared horses because he overheard his father and his friend discussing horses and how his father warned his friend not to touch the white horse or it will bite. Finally, Little Hana€™s anxiety vanished because he became more attentive of and comprehended his Oedipus complex (Meyer et al., 2009).
Biological, psychological, and social factors involved with Little Hans Application for Clinical Psychology: The Case of Little Hans in reviewing the case of Little Hans, Freud indicated this study correlates to his predicament in his theories of child development. Evaluating the case study, an implicated review that includes biological, psychological and social factors was contemplated. Freud€™theory presents the psychosexual stages of development and the child€™s preoccupation with his genitals as the biological reference of the study. Freud€™s theory also suggested oedipal complex or an extreme emotional attachment to the mothers and feelings of jealousy and hostility directed toward their fathers.
The psychological factors would the abnormal behavior little Hans had established and phobias that connected to a classically conditioned to fear horses (Marked by Teachers, 2015). The case study also revealed as a part of the psychological factors Little Hans had established anxiety; he was afraid to go out of the house because of his phobia of horses. According to Marked by Teachers (2015), afraid came up with the conclusion that Hans was scared of horses because he feared being castrated by his father as Freud said that his father was symbolically the horse that Hans feared and he feared being bitten by the horse but really fearedcastration†(para. 4).
In the social aspect to case the study was the fear to horses; Little Hans exhibited the fear of horses and would be problematic as he had an inability to leave the house. Little Hans fear of horses and leaving out of the house would indicate Little Hans social activities would be greatly interrupted. Appropriate Interventions Hans provided Freud with a psychoanalytic foundation to describe both cause and cure for anxiety. Psychoanalytic or psychodynamic psychotherapy includes concepts and theories of analytical psychology and psychoanalysis (British Psychoanalytic Council, 2015). It is a restorative method which helps clients in several ways.
In Little Hans case, psychoanalytic psychotherapy helped him understand and resolve his problems by increasing attentiveness on Application for Clinical Psychology: The Case of Little Hans his inner “concept†of society and its influence over connections both past and present, or in other words came to understand his Oedipus complex (British Psychoanalytic Council, 2015). Another method to help Little Hana€™s is cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Many psychologists use CBT to assist individuals in recognizing and learning to deal with the components that contribute to their anxiety (Help Guide, 2015). Behavioral therapy consists of methods to decrease how a persona€™s ideas contribute to anxiety disorders (Help Guide, 2015).
Through cognitive therapy, Little Hans can identify his negative thoughts (ask himself what was he thinking when he started to feel anxious), challenge the negative ideas (questioning the proof for the feared thoughts and assessing the reality of negative calculations), and removing the negative thoughts with realistic ideas. Rationale of Intervention Between the biopsychosocial approach and Oedipus complex the two refer to the thoughts and processes of memories causing personality traits.
Personality traits in Oedipus complex refer to jealousy, anxiety, and depression. These are all symptoms Little Hans experienced in his childhood with his parents, due to the traumatic experiences of his problem of masturbation and their tendencies of attachment. Hans mother told him if he were to continue to masturbate the doctor would cut off his fiddler, and his father said if he did not stop his masturbation he would not overcome his anxiety (Blum, 2007). The fear of castration caused anxiety to Hans and the fear of separation of his mother caused jealousy and depression.
The rationale for selecting Oedipus complex refers to Freud€™s major theoretical advances of anxiety in response to fear, dual drives, structural theory, and non-defense ego functions. The Cause and Effect of Attachment Application for Clinical Psychology: The Case of Little Hans the setting behind the cause and effect to Hans is in regards to his mother€™s attachment another child. Hans slept with his parents for four years and he was to bathe and go to the restroom with his mother; causing sexual confusion to Hans because his father found disproval in Hans sleeping with his mother.
When Hansa€™s parents were not clear in answering his curiosities regarding the differences between male and female sex organs the confusion turned into him putting it all together himself causing his own fantasies rather than the truth of reality. These fantasize turned into Hansa€™s own reality causing him to have personality disorders. Not only during his childhood did he have traumatic experiences and confusions but even after Hansa€™parents divorced the tendencies continued altering tendencies to follow him into his adulthood.
Freud suggested the parents focus on helping Hans with his education on order to understand his fantasies to the realities of science and education to alter his reality, such as learning about reeducation. Later, Hans seemed to be on track with his adult developmental processes (A. Freud,1980). Little Hans, in his adulthood, becomes Herbert Graf a science and art of psychoanalysis opera artist, thanks to Freud€™s psychoanalytic therapies with Hans.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!