System Security Plan Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
System Security Plan Essay Assignment
System Security Plan
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 100.0 %Content 20.0 % System Identification The student does not complete this section of the plan adequately. Subject knowledge is not evident. The student only outlines some of the identifying information about the system with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. The student provides basic identifying information about the system with some supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. The student provides detailed identifying information about the system with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. The student provides comprehensive identifying information (who is responsible for it, its purpose, and the sensitivity) about the system with supporting details and examples; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. All sub sections are complete. Subject knowledge is excellent. 20.0 % Management Controls The student does not complete this section of the plan adequately. Subject knowledge is not evident. The student only outlines some of the management control measures to meet the protection requirements of the major application or general support system with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. The student provides basic management control measures to meet the protection requirements of the major application or general support system with some supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. The student provides detailed management control measures to meet the protection requirements of the major application or general support system with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. The student comprehensively describes the management control measures to meet the protection requirements of the major application or general support system with supporting details; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. All sub sections are complete. Subject knowledge is excellent. 20.0 % Operational Controls The student does not complete this section of the plan adequately. Subject knowledge is not evident. The student only outlines some of the operational control measures to meet the protection requirements of the target systems with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. The student provides basic operational control measures to meet the protection requirements of the target systems with some supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. The student provides detailed operational control measures to meet the protection requirements of the target systems with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. The student comprehensively describes the operational control measures to meet the protection requirements of the target systems with supporting details; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. All sub sections are complete. Subject knowledge is excellent. 20.0 % Technical Controls The student does not complete this section of the plan adequately. Subject knowledge is not evident. The student only outlines some of the technical control measures to meet the protection requirements of the major application or general support system with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. The student provides basic technical control measures to meet the protection requirements of the major application or general support system with some supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. The student provides detailed technical control measures to meet the protection requirements of the major application or general support system with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. The student comprehensively describes the technical control measures to meet the protection requirements of the major application or general support system with supporting details; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. All sub sections are complete. Subject knowledge is excellent. 10.0 % Screenshots The student does not include the necessary screenshots for submission. NA NA The student includes most of the necessary screenshots as a proof of the completion of system security plan. The student includes all the necessary screenshots as a proof of the completion of system security plan. 10.0 % Language Use, Audience Awareness and Mechanics of Writing Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. 100 % Total Weightage System Security Plan
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
20.0 %
System
Identification
The student does not
complete this section
of the plan adequately.
Subject knowledge is
not evident.
The student only outlines
some of the identifying
information about the
system with few supporting
details and examples. Little
subject knowledge is
eviden
t.
The student provides basic
identifying information
about the system with
some supporting details
and examples. Subject
knowledge appears to be
good.
The student provides
detailed identifying
information about the
system with supporting
details and exam
ples.
Subject knowledge
appears to be good.
The student provides
comprehensive identifying
information (who is responsible for
it, its purpose, and the sensitivity)
about the system with supporting
details and examples; information
and justifications are a
ccurate and
appropriate. All sub sections are
complete. Subject knowledge is
excellent.
20.0 %
Management
Controls
The student does not
complete this section
of the plan adequately.
Subject knowledge is
not evident.
The student only outlines
some of the
management
control measures to meet
the protection requirements
of the major application or
general support system with
few supporting details and
examples. Little subject
knowledge is evident.
The student provides basic
management control
measures to me
et the
protection requirements
of the major application
or general support system
with some supporting
details and examples.
Subject knowledge
appears to be good.
The student provides
detailed management
control measures to meet
the protection
requirement
s of the major
application or general
support system with
supporting details and
examples. Subject
knowledge appears to be
good.
The student comprehensively
describes the management control
measures to meet the protection
requirements of the major
applicat
ion or general support
system with supporting details;
information and justifications are
accurate and appropriate. All sub
sections are complete. Subject
knowledge is excellent.
20.0 %
Operational
Controls
The student does not
complete this section
of t
he plan adequately.
Subject knowledge is
not evident.
The student only outlines
some of the operational
control measures to meet
the protection requirements
of the target systems with
few supporting details and
examples. Little subject
knowledge is evident
.
The student provides basic
operational control
measures to meet the
protection requirements
of the target systems with
some supporting details
and examples. Subject
knowledge appears to be
good.
The student provides
detailed operational
control measure
s to meet
the protection
requirements of the
target systems with
supporting details and
examples. Subject
knowledge appears to be
good.
The student comprehensively
describes the operational control
measures to meet the protection
requirements of the target
systems with supporting details;
information and justifications are
accurate and appropriate. All sub
sections are complete. Subject
knowledge is excellent.
20.0 %
Technical
Controls
The student does not
complete this section
of the plan adequately.
Sub
ject knowledge is
not evident.
The student only outlines
some of the technical
control measures to meet
the protection requirements
of the major application or
general support system with
few supporting details and
The student provides bas
ic
technical control
measures to meet the
protection requirements
of the major application
or general support system
with some supporting
The student provides
detailed technical control
measures
to meet the
protection requirements
of the major application
or general support system
with supporting details
The student comprehensively
describes the technical control
measures to meet the protection
r
equirements of the major
application or general support
system with supporting details;
information and justifications are
System Security Plan
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
20.0 % System
Identification
The student does not
complete this section
of the plan adequately.
Subject knowledge is
not evident.
The student only outlines
some of the identifying
information about the
system with few supporting
details and examples. Little
subject knowledge is
evident.
The student provides basic
identifying information
about the system with
some supporting details
and examples. Subject
knowledge appears to be
good.
The student provides
detailed identifying
information about the
system with supporting
details and examples.
Subject knowledge
appears to be good.
The student provides
comprehensive identifying
information (who is responsible for
it, its purpose, and the sensitivity)
about the system with supporting
details and examples; information
and justifications are accurate and
appropriate. All sub sections are
complete. Subject knowledge is
excellent.
20.0 %
Management
Controls
The student does not
complete this section
of the plan adequately.
Subject knowledge is
not evident.
The student only outlines
some of the management
control measures to meet
the protection requirements
of the major application or
general support system with
few supporting details and
examples. Little subject
knowledge is evident.
The student provides basic
management control
measures to meet the
protection requirements
of the major application
or general support system
with some supporting
details and examples.
Subject knowledge
appears to be good.
The student provides
detailed management
control measures to meet
the protection
requirements of the major
application or general
support system with
supporting details and
examples. Subject
knowledge appears to be
good.
The student comprehensively
describes the management control
measures to meet the protection
requirements of the major
application or general support
system with supporting details;
information and justifications are
accurate and appropriate. All sub
sections are complete. Subject
knowledge is excellent.
20.0 %
Operational
Controls
The student does not
complete this section
of the plan adequately.
Subject knowledge is
not evident.
The student only outlines
some of the operational
control measures to meet
the protection requirements
of the target systems with
few supporting details and
examples. Little subject
knowledge is evident.
The student provides basic
operational control
measures to meet the
protection requirements
of the target systems with
some supporting details
and examples. Subject
knowledge appears to be
good.
The student provides
detailed operational
control measures to meet
the protection
requirements of the
target systems with
supporting details and
examples. Subject
knowledge appears to be
good.
The student comprehensively
describes the operational control
measures to meet the protection
requirements of the target
systems with supporting details;
information and justifications are
accurate and appropriate. All sub
sections are complete. Subject
knowledge is excellent.
20.0 %
Technical
Controls
The student does not
complete this section
of the plan adequately.
Subject knowledge is
not evident.
The student only outlines
some of the technical
control measures to meet
the protection requirements
of the major application or
general support system with
few supporting details and
The student provides basic
technical control
measures to meet the
protection requirements
of the major application
or general support system
with some supporting
The student provides
detailed technical control
measures to meet the
protection requirements
of the major application
or general support system
with supporting details
The student comprehensively
describes the technical control
measures to meet the protection
requirements of the major
application or general support
system with supporting details;
information and justifications are
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!