System Responsibility of DCMA Responses
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
System Responsibility of DCMA Responses
STUDENT 1 (Jeremy):
Forum Questions:
- Define the Defense Contract Management Agency’s and Defense Contract Audit Agency’s role.
The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) is an independent watch dog for the DoD, and affiliates, which enables the warfighter ability, with timely logistics, and product delivery, while supporting cost effective resources and readiness.
The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) works in conjunction with the DCMA, buy providing and advisory and audit services to the DoD, and affiliates when the call is made. The DCAA also determines if a contracts cost is allowable, allocable, or even reasonable, this service saves the tax payers millions.
- Describe how a Defense Contract Audit Agency audit report can help meet a negotiation objective.
The DCAA is a great asset when working through contracts, as the DCMA works with the contracting officer (CO) once the contract is sent forward, the DCAA steps in to audit and validate the information and costs are accurate and effective for the warfighter. This is the critical step, because if the auditor finds ad error or possible savings. they can send this to the DCMA for review, but this does not hold a legal binding contract to the government as the contractor.
- Search for a recent, within the last five years, defense contract audit report and explain the reasons for the audit, the findings and possible impact in today’s defense contract audit agency role within a new President and Defense Department administration.
The article I found was over the actions of CO’s in relation to the DCAA suggestions and recommendations. This issue that arose was the negligence of a few CO’s in providing relevant responses to the DCAA’s recommendations, and the lack of attempting to sustaining the DCAA reported questions costs. This issue is the tax payers, and the Presidents desires are harmed by the lack of available funding, and the new members to the Defense Department administration are lacking the budget needed due to miss appropriations.
References
Evaluation of Contracting Officer Actions on Defense Contract Audit Agency Reports that Disclaim an Opinion. (2019). Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2019/Dec/02/2002218761/-1/-1/1/DODIG-2020-036_REDACTED.PDF
STUDENT 2 (Zabi):
- Define the Defense Contract Management Agency’s and Defense Contract Audit Agency’s role.
Defense Contract Management Agency produces and delivers equipment and supplies to warfighters they need to fight, get trained, and survive. Although, they are not producing equipment directly, but the agency works closely by providing contract administration services to the Department of Defense, other federal organizations, and international partners. They oversee the award process from pre-award closing the award. Around 12,000 employees work at DCMA and manage contracts valued at more than $7 trillion worldwide. They are considered the eyes and ears of the DoD and its partners.
Whereas, DCAA is responsible to oversee audit and financial services of DoD and other agencies responsible for purchasing and managing contracts. According to the DCAA website, they are responsible to ensure the best value for the funds spent on DoD contracts, but I found their role to be considered critical to investigate fraud in contracts and prevent waste of resources.
- Describe how a Defense Contract Audit Agency audit report can help meet a negotiation objective.
DCAA’s role is and services are obtained during the implementation or after the closeout of the award. I don’t think if they will have any role in the pre-award process to consider the negotiation objectives. But they help a negotiation objective by reviewing the processes in place and whether the contract terms and conditions are followed or not. They ask a few tough questions that impact the project objectives.
Few examples are, how the best value was evaluated during the award process? Does the contractor have the capacity to deliver quality goods/services? Did they meet the expected delivery timeline? If answers are no, recommendations are provided to each area which helps meet a negation objective and, in some cases, they saved millions of taxpayers’ money.
- Search for a recent, within the last five years, defense contract audit report and explain the reasons for the audit, the findings, and possible impact in today’s defense contract audit agency role within a new President and Defense Department administration.
I pulled a recent audit report for the years ended September 30, 2019, and 2018. They have audited the consolidated balance sheet of DCAA that includes statements of Net Cost, Changes in net Position, and Combined Statement of budgetary resources. There were no major findings and the report concluded that the financial statements present fairly and DCAA is in a good position in all financial respects.
The net costs, net position, and budgetary resources were in a generally accepted accounting principle. I didn’t find a major finding of concern in the report to analyze possible impacts within a new President or DoD administration. But I think the agency is performing excellent and the new president and DoD administration must continue to work closely with men and women serving this country in every role.
https://www.dcma.mil/About-Us/
https://www.dcaa.mil/Portals/88/DCAA_FY2019_Final_Audit_Report.pdf
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!