System and Enterprise level testing
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
System and Enterprise level testing
Fall 2018 Project guideline Name: CWID:
Identification of Problems/Tasks:
- Understand the problems presented
- Provide appropriate information with associated objective evidence
Analysis:
- Evaluate and provide relevant impact of the problems presented
- Provide responses using information from quantitative measures as derived from software tool results
Solutions and Recommendations:
- Provide solution to task/problems presented along with any associated action plans
PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS Use the project response Word document posted on D2L and begin to respond to all questions.
Be sure and address each question/request in detail providing emphasis on project objectives.
All graphs/charts/tables are to be produced in the native format (excel, project, etc.) and then copied into the response area of the Word document.
Post BOTH the Word document with all responses/graphs/charts/tables AND the objective evidence (the native documents from where you copied the charts/graphs/tables)
Project Start Date: September 4, 2018
Final Project Due Date: December 7, 2018
Cover all points in the response. Use the Word document posted as the template for all responses and task work. The Word document will be the formal response back to Astin Martin Graphics. All tables, graphics, and figures created by other tools should be copied and pasted in the Word document maintaining a professional appearance with appropriate labeling of all figures, diagrams, tables, artifacts pasted. As this is a professional document, do not leave template examples in your submission.
Where applicable, provide clear documentation, graphics, diagrams, and tables that help clarify any responses.
STATEMENT OF WORK SUMMARY RFP awarded for specific web services which will be incorporated into a web graphics company (Astin Martin Graphics LLC). Topical level requirements for the software were provided. Deliverable products include:
- Systems Engineering to provide appropriate requirements decomposition
- Software Engineering to provide design/development/unit test of software
- System Test Engineering to provide component and enterprise level testing
- Quality Engineering to provide quality control through the entire development life cycle
- Management functions to include all primary functions (project management, finance, planning & scheduling, Overhead support (contracts, engineering matrix, etc.)
Award date of May 15 and required completion date (deliverables provided) of November 15.
Astin Martin Graphics request of planned deliverables, acceptance criteria, quality plan, and work breakdown structure. These items need to be provided in an acceptable time for Astin Martin to review and approve.
Astin Martin Graphics further requests other deliverables to include final software (source and binary) which meets all approved acceptance criteria, associated design documents (system and development level)
All project questions or request for project scope changes should be directed to the Astin Martin Graphic designee (course instructor).
There is no requirement relative to project tools used to generate the required data.
Topical requirements include:
- System Engineering: UML design appropriate graphic widgets to display aeronautical expanse gauges within the technical specs guidelines for twenty-five different visual aspects. Include appropriate level of peer review. Design should include graphical mock-up of gauges.
- System Engineering: Derive component level requirements for Software Engineering to design, code, and unit test and System Test can provide System and Enterprise level testing
- Software Engineering: Provide appropriate level design artifacts from System Engineering UML design artifacts. Include appropriate level of peer review.
- Software Engineering: Code and Unit Test software modules that execute the software which meets all topical and derived requirements
- System Test Engineering: Derive sell-off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval.
- System Test Engineering: Derive System and Enterprise Level Test Cases. Include appropriate level of peer review.
- System Test Engineering: Execute test cases as software modules become available
- Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks during the processes described for System Engineering, Software Engineering, and System Test Engineering as appropriate
- Include the following customer related reviews: Design Review (after System Engineering completes design artifacts), Pre-Ship Review (provided prior to Astin Martin Graphics acceptance of software), and Final Acceptance Test (software demonstration at customer facility showing software meets all requirements as installed)
Approved labor rates as follows:
- System Engineer I: 43.15
- System Engineer II: 48.37
- System Engineer III: 51.17
- Lead System Engineer: 58.91
- Software Engineer I: 41.38
- Software Engineer II: 47.62
- Software Engineer III: 51.01
- Lead Software Engineer: 59.83
- System Test Engineer I: 40.78
- System Test Engineer II: 43.79
- System Test Engineer III: 49.25
- Lead System Test Engineer: 51.25
- Quality Engineer I: 40.38
- Quality Engineer II: 47.55
- Quality Engineer III: 51.01
- Lead Quality Engineer: 59.83
- Project Manager: 91.22 (LOE – Level of Effort)
- Chief Engineer: 72.41 (LOE – Level of Effort)
Approved overhead rates as follows:
- Finance: 7.6% of total hours
- Planning & Scheduling: 6.2% of total hours
- Management (Contracts/Senior Management): 2.1% of total hours
- Facility: 1.3% of total hours
- HR/Staffing: 0.54% of total hours
ACTIVITY / TASK LIST BY LOWEST WBS LEVEL LEG 2.1 Select Layout
System Engineering: Create outline of UML design.
Software Engineering: Assist system engineering.
Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks
2.2 Design Graphics
System Engineering: Design appropriate graphic widgets to display aeronautical expanse gauges within the technical specs guidelines for twenty-five different visual aspects. Include appropriate level of peer review.
Software Engineering: Assist system engineering.
Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
2.3 Approve design
System Engineering: Derive component level requirements for Software Engineering to design, code, and unit test and System Test can provide System and Enterprise level testing.
Software Engineering: Assist system engineering
System Test Engineering: Derive sell-off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval.
Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
3.1 Write content
System Engineering: Assist software engineering
Software Engineering: Code and Unit Test software modules that execute the software which meets all topical and derived requirements.
Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
3.2 Approve content
System Engineering: Assist software engineering
Software Engineering: Provide appropriate level design artifacts from System Engineering UML design artifacts. Include appropriate level of peer review.
System Test Engineering: Derive sell-off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval.
Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
3.3 Insert content in pages
System Engineering: Assist software engineering
Software Engineering: Check the function
Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
4.1 Set up web service on test
System Engineering: Corporate with other engineers for opinion
Software Engineering: Corporate with other engineers for opinion
System Test Engineering: Derive System and Enterprise Level Test Cases. Include appropriate level of peer review.
Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
4.2 Perform tests
System Engineering: Corporate with other engineers for opinion
Software Engineering: Corporate with other engineers for opinion
System Test Engineering: Execute test cases as software modules become available
Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
4.3 Approve web service
System Test Engineering: Assist Quality Engineering
Quality Engineering: Quality checks during the processes described for System Engineering, Software Engineering, and System Test Engineering as appropriate
Include the following customer related reviews: Design Review (after System Engineering completes design artifacts), Pre-Ship Review (provided prior to Astin Martin Graphics acceptance of software).
4.4 Set up web service on live environment
System Test Engineering: Assist Quality engineering
Quality Engineering: quality checks, and Final Acceptance Test (software demonstration at customer facility showing software meets all requirements as installed) installed)
NOTIONAL ACTIVITY DURATION SCHEDULE Notional Activity estimated Duration
The estimated total elapsed time for how long an activity will take from starts to finish, including associated waiting time. Also referred to as activity resource estimated or estimated activity resources.
PROJECT QUESTIONS & TASKS
- Provide a project objectiveassociated with the Astin Martin Graphics project. Include a list of assumptionsabout the project.
- What is a work breakdown structure? What is a responsibility matrix? Using the Astin Martin project activity list and activity duration schedule, create a WBS and RAM.
Copy your Work Breakdown Structure here.
Copy your Responsibility Assignment Matrix here.
(Example RAM Template)
- Create a network diagram (graphical diagram) that shows the sequence and dependent relationships identified in the Astin Martin project activity list and activity duration schedule.
- (Major) Using the project start time and the required completion date and the project activity list and activity duration schedule, calculate the ES, EF, LS, and LF times and total slack for each activity. Show results in table form. If your calculations result in a project schedule with negative total slack, revise the project scope, activity estimated durations, and/or sequence or dependent relationships among activities to arrive at an acceptable baseline schedule for completing the project within the required time line. Describe (including tables) the revisions you made.
(Example Template)
- (Major) List all activity costs. From the project activity list and activity duration schedule, estimate the cost of each activity. Then, determine the Total Budgeted Cost (TBC) for the Astin Martin Graphics project. Provide the information in table format by month. Objective evidence of derived costs is required for credit. Use labor and overhead rates as provided in your derived calculations.
(Example Template)
- Provide a cumulative budgeted cost curve for the Astin Martin Graphics project. Provide in appropriate graph format.
- Astin Martin Graphics wants to know if you plan to use a management reserve for their project. Explain what the term reserve means and why you will use contingency reserve in the project or not. Be sure and consider the implications of using or not using the reserve. Provide appropriate detail in your response.
- Astin Martin Graphics wants to know how JBB Software plans to employ cost management and earned value (EV) in their project. Define to them the following: TBC, CBC, CAC, CEV CPI, CV, FCAC, TCPI. In addition, explain to Astin Martin Graphics why it is necessary to calculate the earned value of work performed and how you plan to execute this task.
- Astin Martin Graphics is concerned about how JBB Software will manage risks. Describe what JBB Software plans to do in order to manage risk on the Astin Martin Graphics project and if a risk assessment matrix will be employed and why. Provide appropriate level of detail in your response.
9
Task\Date15-May25-May5-Jun15-Jun25-Jun5-Jul15-Jul25-Jul5-Aug15-Aug25-Aug5-Sep15-Sep25-Sep5-Oct15-Oct25-Oct5-Nov15-Nov
Select Layout
Design Graphics
Approve Design
Write Content
Approve Content
Insert content into page
Set up test web service
Perform tests
Approve web service
Go live
Plan DurationActual Start% Complete (beyond plan)
Baseline Schedule
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!