Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Case Study Analysis
Assignment Overview
Behaving in an ethical manner is foundational to your work as an advanced generalist social worker. Some violations of the NASW Code of Ethics are blatant, but others are less obvious. In this assignment, you analyze a given scenario involving possible violations of the NASW Code of Ethics.
By successfully completing this assignment, you demonstrate your proficiency in the following EPAS and advance generalist specialized behaviors:
- Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior.
- C1.SP.A: Apply professional use of self and leadership skills with colleagues, clients, groups, organizations, and communities.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 7. Demonstrate professional use of self and leadership.
- Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior.
- C1.SP.B: Articulate and provide leadership in the application of the core values and ethical standards of the social work profession through an ethical problem solving model to aid in critical thinking, affective reactions and ethical decision making related to individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities to guide and inform ethical practice in the specialization of advanced generalist social work.
- C1.SP.C Integrate the ethical and effective use of technology at all levels of practice in the specialization of advanced generalist social work with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 1. Identify the unethical use of technology and other ethical and diversity issues in the case.
- Competency 6: Engage With Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C6.SP.A: Apply critical thinking and decision making in verbal and written communication through the use of leadership and technology when engaging with colleagues, individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 2. Analyze the issues involved in a case using critical thinking skills.
- Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C7.SP.A: Apply critical thinking and decision making in verbal and written communication through the use of leadership and technology when assessing colleagues, individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 2. Analyze the issues involved in a case using critical thinking skills.
- Competency 8: Intervene With Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C8.SP.A: Apply critical thinking and decision making in verbal and written communication through the use of leadership and technology when intervening with colleagues, individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 2. Analyze the issues involved in a case using critical thinking skills.
- Competency 9: Evaluate Practice With Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C9.SP.A: Apply critical thinking and decision making in verbal and written communication through the use of leadership and technology evaluations with colleagues, individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 2. Analyze the issues involved in a case using critical thinking skills.
- Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice.
- C2.SP.B: Apply leadership skills, theoretical frameworks, decision making and best-practice interventions with diverse populations.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 6. Demonstrate cultural competence through the application of leadership skills with diverse populations.
- Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice.
- C4.SP.A: Apply leadership skills, decision making and the use of technology to inform evidence-based research practice to develop, implement, evaluate, and communicate interventions across the specialization of advanced generalist practice settings.
- C4.SP.B: Apply leadership skills, decision making and the use of technology to inform program evaluation to develop, implement, evaluate, and communicate interventions across the specialization of advanced generalist practice settings.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 5. Apply leadership skills and the use of technology to inform evidence-based research practice through the application of transformational leadership theory.
- Competency 6: Engage With Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C6.SP.C: Apply leadership skills and emerging technologies in the specialization of advanced generalist social work practice when engaging with individuals, families, group, organizations, and communities to promote systemic change towards client sustainability.
- Related Assignment Criteria:
- 3. Describe leadership behaviors and social work supervision standards used to address an organizational issue.
- 4. Apply leadership skills when working with a supervisee.
- Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C7.SP.C: Apply leadership skills, decision making and emerging technologies in the specialization of advanced generalist social work practice when assessing individuals, families, group, organizations, and communities to promote systemic change towards client sustainability.
- Related Assignment Criteria:
- 3. Describe leadership behaviors and social work supervision standards used to address an organizational issue.
- 4. Apply leadership skills when working with a supervisee.
- Competency 8: Intervene With Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C8.SP.C: Apply leadership skills, decision making and emerging technologies in the specialization of advanced generalist social work practice interventions with individuals, families, group, organizations, and communities to promote systemic change towards client sustainability.
- Related Assignment Criteria:
- 3. Describe leadership behaviors and social work supervision standards used to address an organizational issue.
- 4. Apply leadership skills when working with a supervisee.
- Competency 9: Evaluate Practice With Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C9.SP.C: Apply leadership skills, decision making and emerging technologies in the specialization of advanced generalist social work practice evaluation with individuals, families, group, organizations, and communities to promote systemic change towards client sustainability.
- Related Assignment Criteria:
- 3. Describe leadership behaviors and social work supervision standards used to address an organizational issue.
- 4. Apply leadership skills when working with a supervisee.
Assignment Description
For this assignment, review the scenario in the Case Studies: Ethics media piece in which a social worker under your supervision is using technology inappropriately in his or her work, and is violating the NASW Code of Ethics. After viewing the case study, analyze the case. Identify the unethical use of technology, diversity issues, and any other ethical issues by considering advanced generalist social work practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. Be sure to consult the NASW Code of Ethics, the NASW, ASWB, CSWE, and CSWA Standards for Technology in Social Work Practice, and the NASW Standards and Indicators for Cultural Competence in Social Work Practice, and use information from those documents to support your work.
Assignment Instructions
Write a paper using current APA format:
Issue Analysis:
- Identify the unethical use of technology and other ethical and diversity issues in the case.
- Demonstrate your critical thinking skills through analysis of the issues (as opposed to a superficial statement of the issues).
Plan:
Develop a plan that assures your supervision addresses client, social worker, and agency safety and incorporates known best practices. Be sure your plan addresses the issues you identified in the section above.
- Describe leadership behaviors and social work supervision standards used to address the issue. What leadership behaviors and social work supervision standards should be used? How would you apply advanced generalist social work best practices to address these issues?
- Apply leadership skills when working with a supervisee as you develop your plan. What transformational leadership skills would you apply when dealing with your supervisee?
- Apply leadership skills and the use of technology to inform evidence-based research practice through the application of transformational leadership theory. How could you apply transformational leadership theory to advance and improve social work practices when addressing this issue? Include any use of technology and evidence-based research you would use to support your choices.
- Demonstrate cultural competence through the application of leadership skills with diverse populations. Are there any cultural or diversity aspects that need to be addressed? How would you implement best practices with diverse individuals to address these issues? Demonstrate your cultural competence through use of leadership skills regarding diversity issues in your analysis and plan.
- Demonstrate professional use of self in your role as supervisor. How might you discuss this issue with your supervisee and how might you work with the supervisee to design your plan of action?
Complete and submit your assignment by Sunday night of the unit.
Your instructor provides feedback on your assignments. The feedback you receive may be valuable for future assignments in this course.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:
- Written communication: Communicate in a professional manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations of the social work profession. Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
- APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards. Include a title page, reference page, headers, and appendices as applicable.
- Cited resources: Minimum of three scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
- Length of paper: Minimum of three double-spaced pages.
- Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.
Resources
- Case Study Analysis Scoring Guide.
- Capella library.
- Capella Writing Center.
- Social Work Masters Library Research Guide.
- Writing Feedback Tool.
- APA Style and Format.
- Case Studies: Ethics.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!