Sustainable Food Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Sustainable Food Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Sustainable food systems are critical in ensuring that global food production, processing, and distribution are sustainable, safe, and healthy for people and the planet. Sustainable food systems also encompass social, economic, and environmental dimensions that are interconnected, and their proper functioning depends on the active participation of multiple stakeholders. This article provides a comprehensive review of sustainable food systems, their components, challenges, and opportunities for transformation towards more sustainable and equitable food systems.
- Sustainable food systems are built on four key pillars: food security and nutrition, economic viability, social equity, and environmental sustainability. Food security and nutrition refer to ensuring access to safe, nutritious, and culturally appropriate food for all. Economic viability refers to ensuring that food production and distribution systems are financially sustainable for farmers, food processors, distributors, and retailers. Social equity refers to ensuring that the benefits of the food system are shared equitably among all stakeholders, including smallholder farmers, women, and marginalized groups. Environmental sustainability refers to ensuring that food systems operate within the limits of natural resources and do not degrade ecosystems or contribute to climate change.
- One of the major challenges facing sustainable food systems is the current food system’s environmental footprint. The current food system accounts for around one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, with significant contributions from livestock production, transportation, and energy-intensive food processing. In addition, unsustainable agricultural practices, such as overuse of fertilizers and pesticides, have contributed to soil degradation, water pollution, and loss of biodiversity. Therefore, there is a need to transform the current food system to reduce its environmental impact and ensure long-term sustainability.
- Another challenge facing sustainable food systems is ensuring that all people have access to safe and nutritious food. Although the global food supply is sufficient to feed the global population, many people still suffer from hunger and malnutrition. This is due to factors such as poverty, inequality, conflict, and food waste, which prevent people from accessing food. Therefore, sustainable food systems must focus on ensuring food security and nutrition for all, particularly the most vulnerable and marginalized groups.
- To transform the current food system into a sustainable food system, several opportunities exist. One such opportunity is to shift towards more plant-based diets, which can reduce the environmental footprint of the food system and improve human health. Another opportunity is to promote sustainable agriculture practices, such as agroforestry, organic farming, and conservation agriculture. These practices can improve soil health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve biodiversity while supporting food production.
- The adoption of technology in the food system is another opportunity for promoting sustainable food systems. For instance, precision agriculture, which uses data and sensors to optimize crop management, can help reduce water use and fertilizer inputs. Similarly, blockchain technology can improve traceability and transparency in food supply chains, which can enhance food safety and reduce food waste.
- Transforming the current food system into a sustainable food system requires the participation of multiple stakeholders, including governments, private sector actors, civil society organizations, and consumers. Governments can create policies that promote sustainable food production and consumption, such as sustainable agriculture subsidies, food labeling, and food waste reduction policies. Private sector actors can invest in sustainable food production and distribution systems, such as organic farming, fair trade, and alternative protein sources. Civil society organizations can advocate for sustainable food policies and promote sustainable food consumption practices. Consumers can make sustainable food choices, such as choosing plant-based diets, reducing food waste, and supporting local food systems.
In conclusion, sustainable food systems are critical in ensuring that global food production, processing, and distribution are sustainable, safe, and healthy for people and the planet. The key pillars of sustainable food systems are food security and nutrition, economic viability, social equity, and environmental sustainability. Although several challenges face sustainable food systems, such as the current food system’s environmental footprint and ensuring access to safe and nutritious food for all.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Sustainable Food Systems: A Comprehensive Review
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!