substance-related disorders and process addictions
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
substance-related disorders and process addictions
Wk 3 Discussion – Title
Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to other students.
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words each response:
What are some of the standard screening and assessment instruments for substance-related disorders and process addictions?
What are some of the DSM diagnostic criteria in the assessment of disorders related to substance abuse and dependency?
Aimee Kaiser
Top of Form
Screening for substance abuse and addictions may be complex, due to the high presence of comorbid mental health disorders with substance abuse (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2016). A few basic screening instruments for substance abuse are: the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST), CAGE, Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory-3 (SASSI-3), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Alcohol Use Inventory (AUI), Addiction Severity Index (ASI), and T-ACE, which was developed specifically to assess substance abuse in pregnant women (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2016). Standardized assessments are helpful because they provide information about a client relative to a normative population, they are objective and indirect, which reduces the clients’ ability to deny or minimize their substance use, and they help counselors plan appropriate treatment responses (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2016). The DSM-5 outlines 11 factors in the diagnosis of a substance use disorder. A few of the diagnostic criteria that indicate abuse or addiction are: using more than intended or over a longer duration than intended; the desire or attempt to decrease use; the exertion of significant time and effort to obtain a substance; craving the substance; use is negatively affecting the individual’s ability to fulfill obligations, or is causing social or interpersonal problems in the individual’s life; withdrawal from social or occupational activities directly related to substance use; using in hazardous situations and continued use despite negative consequences; increasing tolerance; and withdrawal symptoms/experiences which contribute to the individual’s inability to stop using, or the continued use of the substance, in order to avoid or relieve withdrawal symptoms (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2016). The essential factors which define abuse or addiction of a substance are the impacts on one’s life and work, and continued or increased use despite persistent negative impacts on one’s life and work.
Capuzzi, D. & Stauffer, M. D. (2016). Foundations of addictions counseling (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Bottom of Form
Mark Smith
Top of Form
What are some of the standard screening and assessment instruments for substance-related disorders and process addictions?
One of the most widespread assessment tools that is used is the Addiction Severity Index (ASI). The ASI is designed to be a severity rating scale where data is collected through an interview process where the gravity of a clients problem is scored. Like many other rating scale tools used in the medical field, higher the number the more severe the problem is. The ASI covers seven main areas of an individuals personal behavior and environmental influences. The seven sections are medical status, employment/support, drug use, alcohol use, legal status, family/social status, and psychiatric status. The information assembled is used to help plan an effective treatment strategy that is specific to the individuals needs.
What are some of the DSM diagnostic criteria in the assessment of disorders related to substance abuse and dependency?
The DSM-5, being the gold standard text from the American Psychiatric Association, lists out criteria that is used to help define a substance abuse disorder. Some of the criteria are:
- Taking substance in larger amounts than desired
- Not able to cut down or stop
- Spend large amount of time getting, using and recovering from the substance
- Craving for the use of the substance
- Not managing to do what should be done at work, home, or school
- Unending to use, even when it causes difficulties in relationships
- Giving up significant social, occupational, or recreational activities
- Using substances even when it causes danger
- Ongoing use, even when known to have a physical or psychological problem that may have been caused or made worse by the substance
- Increased tolerance of the substance, requiring greater amounts
- Develop withdrawal symptoms, requiring relief by taking more of the substance
DSM-5 and its use by chemical dependency professionals (naadac.org)
Bottom of Form
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!