Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Strategies to Disseminate EBP Case Study
introduction
Adopting EBP as the cornerstone for patient care decisions can improve patient care. Nurses have the chance to serve as role models for EBP by creating policymaking, team-based committee work environments that integrate and sustain EBP (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Nurses are capable of disseminating EBP knowledge to others in the workplace. Without effective dissemination and communication, evidence-based practice in a healthcare organization is unsustainable.
Strategies to Disseminate EBP
Mentorship and staff training are the two EBP dissemination tactics that I would likely implement in my organization. For nurses to acquire and achieve expertise in routinely executing the steps of the EBP process in practice and providing evidence-based interventions to patients, EBP requires significant training, time, and resources (Nilsen et al., 2017).
All aspects of training and performance involve a high level of focus and attention, strong leadership, good communication and collaboration, and also data-based procedures and root-cause analysis of failures (Melnyk, 2012).
Establishing a group of EBP mentors is critical to establishing an EBP attitude inside an organization and implementing evidence-based care. In a study conducted by Melnyk et al. (2012), mentors acquired information and skills necessary to successfully implement and assess EBP improvements within the hospital and were able to collaborate with their colleagues to foster an EBP culture conducive to providing high-quality evidence-based care (Melnyk et al., 2017).
Strategies Least Inclined to Use
Email and presenting at a staff meeting are the two least likely EBP dissemination tactics I would utilize. Because some nurses only work three days a week and do not check their emails every day, they may not be able to acquire the information in a timely manner. Considering staff meetings are held once a month and not everyone attends, presenting at a staff meeting may not be the best approach to disseminating EBP knowledge. Additionally, many nurses who work a 12-hour night shift may not be as engaged and recall essential information.
Barriers to Disseminated Strategies
Obstacles exist that impede EBP from becoming a universally accepted standard of care in a healthcare organization. Obstacles include practitioners’ lack of EBP expertise and understanding, the belief that EBP is time-consuming, the culture and politics of the organization, the lack of support from nursing executives and management, and insufficient resources and involvement in EBP (Melnyk et al., 2017).
To overcome these barriers, the workplace should financially compensate nurses for attending training seminars in order to develop knowledge and competence in EBP material. Furthermore, management should provide some form of incentive to employees who demonstrate expertise and successfully execute EBP content.
Conclusion
Healthcare organizations with high reliability are those that provide safe care and strive to reduce errors while also accomplishing excellent results in terms of quality and safety (Melnyk, 2012). To achieve high reliability, effective dissemination of EBP strategies must be implemented.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!