strategies for successful resolution of workplace conflict and/or bullying
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
strategies for successful resolution of workplace conflict and/or bullying
Consider the healthcare workplace and identify two specific sources of conflict. Next, compare two strategies for successful resolution of workplace conflict and/or bullying.
Peers Response to question above..
Peer 1: Ashley O’Connor posted
Two specific sources of conflict are: managing multiple tasks with a short amount of allotted time, and varying demands and expectations from different individuals. Crawford et al. (2019) explain that conflict contributes to negative workplace outcomes in academic, organizational, work unit and personal outcomes and can effect students, new grads, experienced, and academic faculty nurses. Varying viewpoints of how to resolve an issue can often be the source of workplace conflict, as different people have different ways of resolving the same situation. One or both individuals may demand or expect that their approach is utilized over another’s approach, which creates conflict.
Two approaches to mitigate workplace conflict and/or bullying are founded on evidence-based strategies promoted by the American Nurses Association.
It can be from the top down, management to staff. One journal article said that impartial discipline was a correct action to mitigating workplace bullying (Awko, 2018). The discipline would end in diminishing workplace bullying. Of course all events of workplace bullying have to be taken in discretion by the manager to deem whether or not the event was true workplace bullying, but the next step would be to discipline the person perpetrating the workplace incivility/bullying. The article does not describe how the employee would be disciplined, but that hopefully the discipline would lead to a) an end to the disruptive behavior, and b) lead to improvement in the employee’s behavior.
The second strategy would be “going to the source and managing conflict quickly” (Moreland & Aprker, 2015, para 42). When tackling conflict it is important to use respectful communication styles in every situation. Effective communication styles in managing conflict situations include: active listening, offering thoughtful questions, and planning what you intend to say when offering a resolution to the conflict.
References
Akwo, E. (2018). From the top down: How leadership can diminish workplace bullying: JEN JEN. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 44(2), 109. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1016/j.jen.2017.12.009
Crawford, C., Chu, F., Judson, L., Cuenca, E., Jadalla, A., Tze-Polo, L., Garvida, R. (2019). An integrative review of nurse-to-nurse incivility, hostility, and workplace violence: A GPS for nurse leaders. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 138. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000338
Moreland, J. & Apker, J. (2015, Nov 15). Conflict and stress in hospital nursing: improving communicative responses to enduring professional challenges. Health Communication. 31(7),(815-823). doi:https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1080/10410236.2015.1007548
less
Peer 2:
Christine Auclair posted
Ethical conflict occurs when opposite opinions regarding morals and values takes place. “As a serious occupational problem and stressor, ethical conflict can significantly affect nurses’ physical and mental health, professional performance, social relationships, organizational commitment, and patient advocacy role and may result in moral distress, job dissatisfaction, job burnout, absence from work, and high turnover rate.” (Saberi, Shahriari & Yazdannik, 2019 p. 2428) An example of this is a nurse and doctor dont seem to see eye to eye on decision making for a patient. An example is someone who may be in critical care and is requiring vasopressors and mechanical ventilation to stay alive, but in reality may have no quality of life. Another example is if a patient is able to make medical decisions, but is deemed incompetent. A few weeks back I had a patient who was not the most cooperative and did not follow doctors orders very well because in her eyes she didn’t want to. The patient was alert and oriented with bouts of confusion, but was mostly just noncompliant. The patient was seen by physical therapy and was encouraged to go to rehabilitation because she had come in with falls and was uncooperative with VNA services. The patient had a psych consult placed and was deemed “incompetent” by the doctor. This brought up a lot of issues with the nurses considering we were the ones taking care of her and although she never made the best decisions, she was still able to make proper decisions for herself. In my eyes, if someone is not willing to follow doctors orders that does not mean that they are incomepentent, but some people will always refuse to do what others want them to do even if it’s not the best option. In the end, there was a solution where both the physician, patient and family was in agreeance with that let the patient go home safely. Issues with ethical decisions would lead to multiple people getting involved with the situation. An ethics meeting within the hospital is a solution to solve ethical problems.
strategies for successful resolution of workplace conflict and/or bullying
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!