Strategic Processes and Analysis Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Strategic Processes and Analysis Case Study
Strategic Process and Analysis
Joshua Clark
Capella University
FPX5006
Professor: Rob Shah
January 25, 2022
Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 VRIO or Value Chain analysis 5 A PESTLE analysis 5 Porter’s Five Forces model 6 References 7
Executive Summary
The paper focuses on assessing the strategic processes and analysis of the Indian app known as Josh, which involves sharing short videos. The mobile application is developed and owned by Daily hunt, and it offers the best target for this study because of its trending nature since its announcement. Through the study, some of the desired objectives comprise determining the value of strategic management in endorsing long-term success and achieving sustained competitive benefits. While conducting the assessment process, it is possible to employ strategic thinking strategies in determining affiliated business difficulties
Introduction
Like any other organization, the Josh app has its culture, affecting its ability to remain competitive and provide successful outcomes within the external surroundings being its cultural values. Daily hunt owns the mobile application, an Indian content discovery platform designed to compete with the likes of Instagram in sharing short videos.
The one exceptional characteristic about the application over its competitors is that it serves the middle class of India, which has enabled it to focus on winning the minds time and revenue sharing for anything that is based on the nation’s local language. Examples of internal factors associated with shaping and influencing the organizational strategies implemented at Josh comprise money, resources, and company culture. As for the external factors worth noting, the mobile application company considers factors such as competition from similar businesses and customers and suppliers.
Company culture is an ideal internal factor that needs consideration because, at Josh, the culture comprises values, attitudes, and priorities that the personnel adhere to while working for the firm. The organization demonstrated a different kind of setting whereby it emphasizes collaboration and teamwork from the employees. The company culture is an important aspect to ascertain that culture flows from top to bottom of the personnel.
The workforce often understands the values of the company depending on the nature of individuals employed, promoted, or fired (Casañ, Alier, & Llorens, 2021). Workers need to understand the values the organization’s culture embodies. The money, along with resources, represents the other set of internal factors that shape and influence the strategies of an organization. In great economies, the idea of lacking funds may determine if the company survives. The moment cash resources become limited. The organization feels the impact due to the limited number of people it can employ. Cash resources also jeopardize equipment quality and the rate of advertisements done.
VRIO or Value Chain analysis
The VRIO framework is a form of value chain analysis applicable for assessing the resources available in a firm along with competencies. The framework includes other strategic analyses consisting of Porter’s five forces analysis and SWOT analysis. VRIO stands for value, rarity, imitability, and organization. The Josh app must consider looking into all available resources in the internal value chain to determine if they are valuable, rare, inimitable, or organized (Klemen, Jaklič, & Metka, 2021).
During the development of the Josh application, the value was considered to determine whether the resources available were significant for the firm to maximize the opportunities. Rarity is an important part that ensured the resources offered were unique and the application being developed was not commonly possessed or faced chances of being replaced by competitors. The unique element in value chain analysis was essential because it helped determine if others could substitute the resources. Understanding the possibility of other businesses duplicating the application was attained through the VRIO framework.
A PESTLE Analysis
The PESTLE analysis is an ideal framework applicable in gaining macro images of the industry environment by focusing on political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors. The tool was necessary in the case of Josh’s application because it paved the way for the formation of an impression about the factors likely to impact new businesses. The political aspect was necessary because it established some government policies and competition regulations aligned with developing the application (Cullinane, 2019). As for the economic factor, the company relied on it to determine economic trends, growth rates, taxation, and inflation that affect the distribution of the application.
The social element was reliable in understanding the aspects of attitudes and trends aligned with influencing the business and the target market. Josh relied on social factors in establishing attitudes based on different factors such as money and cultural taboos, among others. The technological factor was necessary for identifying the technology required to develop, distribute, and communicate the application product (Casañ, Alier, & Llorens, 2021).
The legal factor was vital since it involved current and future legal and regulatory demands that affected business, such as the regulations on consumer protection, data protection, and antitrust. The environmental factor considered the different forces that impacted the company and the geographical location of the customers using the application.
Porter’s Five Forces model
The primary purpose of Porter’s Five Forces model involves assessing an overall competitive landscape from a particular business environment. Competition within the industry is the first force associated with the number of competitors and the aptitude of undercutting an organization (Zhang, Leng, & Zhou, 2020). The more significant number of competitors means an organization has lesser power (Baxter, 2019).
Other relevant forces that were significant in the development of the Josh application for the Indian market involved the potential of having new entrants, the power of suppliers, and the power of customers, in addition to the threat of substitute services.
The one exceptional characteristic about the application over its competitors is that it serves the middle class of India, which has enabled it to focus on winning the minds time and revenue sharing for anything that is based on the nation’s local language. The workforce often understands the company’s values depending on the nature of individuals employed, promoted, or fired.
Workers need to understand the importance the organization’s culture embodies. The money, along with resources, represents the other set of internal factors that shape and influence the strategies of an organization. Rarity is an important part that ensured the resources offered were unique and the application being developed was not commonly possessed or faced chances of being replaced by competitors. The political factor was necessary because it established some government policies and competition regulations aligned with developing the application.
References
Baxter, G. (2019). A strategic analysis of cargo lux airlines international position in the global air cargo supply chain using Porter’s five forces model. Infrastructures, 4(1), 6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4010006
Casañ, M. J., Alier, M., & Llorens, A. (2021). A collaborative learning activity to analyze the sustainability of an innovation using PESTLE. Sustainability, 13(16), 8756. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168756
Cullinane, K. (2019). Identifying the main opportunities and challenges from the implementation of a port energy management system: A SWOT/PESTLE analysis. Sustainability, 11(21), 6046. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11216046
Klemen, K., Jaklič Andreja, & Metka, S. (2021). An extended approach to value chain analysis. Journal of Economic Structures, 10(1) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40008-021-00244-6
Zhang, C., Leng, M., & Zhou, L. (2020). DEVELOPING STRATEGIES OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISES EXPLAINED USING PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS MODEL: TAKING MENTAL CHALLENGED CAR WASH AS AN EXAMPLE. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online), 12(3), 50-64.
Strategic Processes and Analysis Case Study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! Strategic Processes and Analysis Case Study