Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
SUBJECTIVE
Stanley is a 64‐year‐old Black male who has been at the clinic regularly for health maintenance. He had an unremarkable physical exam 10 months ago. Routine labs, including a CBC, lipid profile, stool for occult blood, and EKG, were normal. He called requesting to be seen by his primary care provider because he has been having some “personal problems.” He refused to dis-close the nature of the problem and only wants to see his regular provider.
On further questioning Stanley reports problems with urination over the past 6–8 months. The symptoms are getting worse. He reports occasional “leaking” of urine after urination that has been embarrassing. He also reports getting up at least 3 times a night to urinate. Sometimes he has difficulty initiating urination and reports a weaker than usual urinary stream. On further question-ing he reports urinary urgency and occasional urinary frequency but denies pain or burning on urination, blood in the urine, abdominal pain, fever, discharge from his penis, or sexual dysfunction.
Past medical history: Osteoarthritis in both knees; insomnia.
Past surgical history: None.
Family history: Stanley’s father had diabetes mellitus Type 2 and high blood pressure; his brother has prostate problems. His mother has stage 2 dementia.
Social history: Stanley is a retired teacher and has been married to his wife Ella for 42 years. They have 2 sons and 10 grandchildren. He does not smoke, but does drink 2 shots of Cognac on most nights.
Medications: Ibuprofen as needed; Benadryl PRN for sleep.
Allergies: NKDA.
OBJECTIVE
General: Stanley is sitting in a chair, in no acute distress.
Vital signs: Weight is 175 lbs; height is 5 ft 10 inches; oral temperature is 98.5°F; BP is 125/80; heart rate is 74; respirations are 14.
Cardiac: Regular rate and rhythm, no murmurs.
Pulmonary: Clear to auscultation in all areas.
Abdomen: Positive bowel sounds in all quadrants, soft and nontender on palpation.
Genitourinary: No suprapubic tenderness; bladder nonpalpable. Symmetric, enlarged, nontender prostate without nodules. No discharge from penis.
Neuro: Anal sphincter is normal tone, normal perineal sensation.
CRITICAL THINKING
What tool might be useful to evaluate Stanley’s symptoms?
What are the top three differential diagnoses in this case and why?
Which diagnostic tests are required in this case and why?
What are the concerns at this point?
What is the likely diagnosis?
What is the plan of treatment?
What are the plans for referral and follow‐up care?
What health education should be provided to this patient?
Does the patient’s psychosocial history impact how you might treat him?
Are there any standardized guidelines that should be used to treat this case? If so, what are they?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!