Stakeholder Involvement in the Evaluation and Measurement of Event Success
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Stakeholder Involvement in the Evaluation and Measurement of Event Success
Stakeholder involvement is a critical aspect of evaluating and measuring event success. A stakeholder is any individual or group that has an interest in or is affected by the event. Stakeholders can include event attendees, sponsors, vendors, organizers, and local community members. Involving stakeholders in the evaluation process ensures that their perspectives and concerns are taken into account, and can help to improve future events. This article will discuss the importance of stakeholder involvement in evaluating and measuring event success, and provide some practical tips for involving stakeholders in the process.
Why Stakeholder Involvement is Important in Evaluating Event Success
Stakeholders can provide valuable insights into the success of an event. Their feedback can help to identify areas of strength and weakness, and provide suggestions for improvements. For example, attendees may be able to provide feedback on the quality of the speakers, the organization of the event, and the overall experience. Sponsors may be able to provide feedback on the effectiveness of their brand exposure and the return on investment for their sponsorship. Organizers may be able to identify logistical issues and areas for improvement in planning future events. Local community members may be able to provide feedback on the impact of the event on the community, including economic, social, and environmental impacts.
Stakeholder involvement can also help to increase stakeholder satisfaction and engagement. When stakeholders feel that their opinions and concerns are being taken into account, they are more likely to be invested in the success of the event. This can lead to increased attendance, sponsorship, and support for future events.
Tips for Involving Stakeholders in Evaluating Event Success
Identify Stakeholders: The first step in involving stakeholders in the evaluation process is to identify who they are. This may include attendees, sponsors, vendors, organizers, and local community members. It is important to consider the perspectives of all stakeholders to get a comprehensive understanding of the success of the event.
Determine Evaluation Metrics: Once stakeholders have been identified, it is important to determine the evaluation metrics that will be used to measure event success. This may include metrics such as attendance, revenue, sponsor satisfaction, attendee satisfaction, and environmental impact.
Collect Feedback: Stakeholder feedback can be collected through a variety of methods, including surveys, focus groups, and interviews. It is important to use a variety of methods to ensure that feedback is comprehensive and representative of all stakeholders.
Analyze Feedback: Once feedback has been collected, it is important to analyze it to identify common themes and areas for improvement. This may involve categorizing feedback by stakeholder group or evaluation metric.
Develop Action Plan: Based on the feedback collected and analyzed, an action plan should be developed to address areas of weakness and improve future events. This may involve changes to event planning, marketing, or communication strategies.
Communicate Results: It is important to communicate the results of the evaluation to all stakeholders to ensure transparency and accountability. This may involve publishing a report or holding a stakeholder meeting to discuss the findings.
Conclusion
Stakeholder involvement is critical to evaluating and measuring event success. By involving stakeholders in the evaluation process, event organizers can gain valuable insights into the success of the event and identify areas for improvement. This can help to increase stakeholder satisfaction and engagement, and ultimately lead to more successful events in the future.
Stakeholder Involvement in the Evaluation and Measurement of Event Success
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!