Stakeholder Collaboration in the Planning and Execution of Mega Events
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Stakeholder Collaboration in the Planning and Execution of Mega Events
Mega events, such as the Olympic Games and World Expos, bring together people from all over the world to celebrate cultural diversity and sports excellence. These events are complex, involving a variety of stakeholders, including government entities, sponsors, venue owners, athletes, and local communities. Effective collaboration among these stakeholders is crucial to the successful planning and execution of mega events.
The planning phase of mega events is a critical time for stakeholder collaboration. This is when the goals and objectives of the event are established, and the strategies and tactics to achieve them are developed. Collaboration during this phase helps to ensure that the goals and objectives are aligned with the needs and expectations of all stakeholders. It also helps to identify potential areas of conflict and allows for the development of strategies to mitigate them.
One way to facilitate stakeholder collaboration during the planning phase is through the use of multi-stakeholder planning committees. These committees bring together representatives from all key stakeholder groups to discuss and develop the event plans. The committees should be inclusive, transparent, and democratic to ensure that all stakeholders have an equal say in the decision-making process.
Another effective strategy is to hold regular stakeholder meetings to keep everyone informed and engaged throughout the planning process. These meetings can provide an opportunity to share updates, address concerns, and seek input and feedback from all stakeholders.
Effective communication is also critical to stakeholder collaboration during the planning phase. Communication should be open, transparent, and timely to ensure that all stakeholders are informed of any developments and have a chance to provide input and feedback. Communication channels should be established, such as email lists, social media groups, and online portals to ensure that everyone is kept in the loop.
During the execution phase, stakeholder collaboration remains critical to ensuring the event’s success. Each stakeholder group has a specific role to play, and effective collaboration is necessary to ensure that everyone is working towards the same goal.
One way to facilitate collaboration during the execution phase is through the use of a command center or control room. This centralized location serves as a hub for all stakeholders to communicate, coordinate, and make real-time decisions. This approach ensures that everyone is on the same page, and any issues or challenges that arise can be addressed promptly.
Regular stakeholder meetings and communication channels established during the planning phase should also continue during the execution phase. These channels allow for real-time updates and can help to identify and address issues as they arise.
Another effective strategy is to establish a shared set of performance metrics to evaluate the event’s success. These metrics should be agreed upon by all stakeholders during the planning phase and should be regularly reviewed and updated during the execution phase. This approach ensures that everyone is working towards the same goals and can help to identify areas for improvement.
In conclusion, stakeholder collaboration is critical to the successful planning and execution of mega events. Effective collaboration during the planning phase ensures that all stakeholders’ needs and expectations are considered, and potential conflicts are identified and addressed. During the execution phase, stakeholder collaboration ensures that everyone is working towards the same goals, and issues are addressed promptly. Regular stakeholder meetings, open communication, and the use of a shared set of performance metrics can help facilitate stakeholder collaboration throughout the event’s lifecycle.
Stakeholder Collaboration in the Planning and Execution of Mega Events
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!