Specialized Substance Abuse Treatment Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Specialized Substance Abuse Treatment Essay
Case #1
The patient is a 58-year-old woman with chronic pain due to inflammatory arthritis. She presents for her first appointment with you in a primary care office. She states that she is aware that she is asking for an early refill of her Oxycontin however she is traveling out of state, and she is concerned that she may have a flare up on her trip.
- Apply the steps in SBIRT to this scenario:
Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based method that detects individuals that may be abusing alcohol or drugs. SBIRT was developed to prevent or decrease health-related injuries, disease, accidents, or negative outcomes (SAMHSA, 2020).
Screening: A pre-screening questionnaire would be provided to this individual to determine how often they use recreational/prescription drugs and/or alcohol. In this case, the individual is using a prescription drug. Once this is determined, they will be provided a Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) that asks specific questions in relation to use of the drug being used (UKMC/SBIRT, n.d.) or they can be provided. The score tallied from the DAST questionnaire will determine the individual’s level of risk. If the score is O, they’re considered a level 1/low risk. In level 1, the provider would encourage positive preferences and inform the individual concerning the risks of drug use. If the score is 1 or 2, they’re consider level 2/risky. In level 2, the provider will discuss brief intervention to refrain or decrease the use of drugs. If the score of the DAST questionnaire was 3-5, they’re considered a level 3/harmful. In this instance the individual will be given a brief intervention to decrease use along with a follow-up appointment. If the score is 6-10, they’re considered level 4/severe. In this case, the individual will be asked to accept referral for specialty treatment UKMC/SBIRT, n.d.).
Brief Intervention: Depending on the severity of determined addiction, brief intervention will consist of patient-centered conversation that uses motivational interviewing ideas, which helps to raise awareness of the individuals drug use and stimulate them to alter their behaviors (UKMC/SBIRT, n.d.). Brief intervention should last approximately 5-15 minutes on the same day of the first screening. It will be recommended the individual changes their behavior to abstain or decrease their use of the drug, then continued follow-up will be necessary (UKMC/SBIRT, n.d.). Individuals with more serious concerns from their abuse of drugs or those who refuse specialized treatment, will have more intense interventions with follow-up. Severe cases the focus is to inspire the individual to accept a referral for specialized treatment (UKMC/SBIRT, n.d.).
Referral to Treatment: Individuals identified as needing specialized substance abuse treatment.
- Identify additional questions for this patient:
It would be important to make the individual feel as comfortable as possible. This can be an embarrassing subject for the person being questioned. The provider must convey that they will not be reporting their answers to law enforcement and that the information they provide will be kept confidential. The provider must be careful of how questions are worded and not to come across as judgmental. Showing the individual respect by asking permission is an important method of communication. The individual will likely want to know why they are being asked questions and the provider should be open and honest, while showing concern toward their situation. The individual must know that answering your questions is an option. I would want to ask this individual how long they have been taking opioids, how often are they taking it, who prescribed them the medication, and whether anything else has helped their chronic pain. I would also want to know about any other stressors or concerns they may be having in their life, and whether they have a support system. This would be to assess other concerns that may be lending itself to their addiction (McBride, 2010).
- Develop a treatment plan for this patient:
This individual may benefit from buprenorphine, an opioid partial agonist, as part of a medication assisted treatment (MAT) (SAMHSA, 2021). This can only be prescribed from a provider with a DEA license, and specific training. In conjunction with buprenorphine, the individual should receive counseling and behavioral therapy. They must be monitored closely throughout treatment (SAMHSA, 2021).
Case #2
The patient is a 24-year-old man brought to your clinic by his family for an evaluation. The patient states that he is struggling with prescription pain pills and wants help. He appears to be in opioid withdrawal; he describes anorexia and diarrhea, he is yawning and sweating upon examination. He scores 15 on the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS), indicating moderate withdrawal.
- Initiate office-based buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone) with a plan for observation.
It is recommended that Suboxone be provided 12-14 hours after the last dose of an opioid to manage withdrawals symptoms. The dose should be strong enough to suppress symptoms. This is usually anywhere from 4-16 mg per day, 2-4 mg to start, and increase in 2-4mg increments. The dose will slowly be tapered over as little as 3-5 days, or 30 days or more (ASAM, 2015). The patient will be observed in the office after the initial induction of Suboxone. Individual may need behavioral therapy along with referral to suboxone treatment center, if warranted
- Include your rationale for each treatment decision
Suboxone has been tried and true, and providers with a DEA license and special training are able to prescribe this medication safely (ASAM, 2015). If a drug like Methadone is prescribed, it requires closer monitoring due to common misuse.
- Develop a treatment plan for this patient that includes ongoing MAT and psychosocial treatment interventions.
Psychosocial treatment is necessary when combined with MAT, there should be frequent office visits, and frequent blood monitoring to test for drugs (ASAM, 2015).
- Construct a safe taper schedule for a patient taking alprazolam (Xanax) 2mg TID. Include a brief narrative explaining the evidence for tapering a patient who has been on a benzodiazepine for an extended amount of time.
It takes approximately 8 weeks to wean from Xanax. The dose is typically decreased by 25% every quarter of the determined withdrawal period. In this given case, the dose of Xanax would decrease to 4.5mg in two weeks, then decrease to 3mg for two weeks, then 0.75mg for two weeks, so forth (AAC, 2021).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!