Special Educational Needs Discussion Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Special Educational Needs Discussion Case Study
Task 6.2 Discussion due 23 March – end of Week 9
Instructions. Complete the tables below: 6.2a serves as a guide to organize your discussion, then, in 6.2b, write the discussion in paragraph form.
Research Question (copy from Task 2c) Teachers use a limited amount of teaching resources to assist mild and moderate disability students during their classes.
Task 6.2a Discussion Organization Result Reference & Main Point Connection/Link Summarize/copy your most important results from task 6a (minimum of 3) For each result, write the reference (research article) that is related to your result (from task 2 or other sources)
the main idea, result or key point of the reference that relates to your result
Based on your readings, explain how the reference/literature fits or goes against the result you found “Students should be provided with individual timetables. They should attend various regular (mainstream) classes according to their ability to learn at the ‘level’ at which subjects are taught” (DJK, & Balakrishnan, 2012). ”
b. In major cases, students with mild and moderate disability are not able to follow the same curriculum as their peers. Students with mild and moderate disability require the adaptation of timetables for effective education.
The results of the survey show that teachers have an unclear approach to adapting timetables for mild and moderate disability students. In the chosen article, it is indicated that the aim of education is not simply to put students with mild and moderate disabilities in the same conditions with other students but to create for them suitable conditions for studying within the frames of social interaction. a. “Teachers too, in developing countries, have little or no training in a person- centred approach while working with students with SEN (special educational needs)” (DJK, & Balakrishnan, 2012).
b. Teachers have a limited training in working with mild and moderate disability students.
according to the articles, the rate of having included the students with disability with normal students becomes high, but its efficiency suffers from the incompetency of teachers. From the survey, it is also clear that educators themselves realize that they do not have enough knowledge and skills for the successful much uses of special teaching strategies.
a. “The success of inclusive education depends greatly upon the availability and expertise of SEN staff, and their ability to coordinate and share responsibilities
with the mainstream staff, when educating students with SEN” (DJK, & Balakrishnan, 2012)
b. Teachers need to collaborate with special educators to develop the efficient strategies of inclusive education and ways for its realization.
Teachers do not have enough knowledge and skills for the realization of inclusive education in their classes. Most of them regard the collaboration with a shadow teacher (the specialist of SEN staff). This opinion is also supported in the analyzed article.
Task 6.2b Discussion Write-Up (approx. 500-750 words total) For Result 1 – What do the results mean?
– How do they relate to the literature?
Refer to the literature you reviewed in task 2 plus additional relevant literature if desired.
With the help of the survey, we have clarified that 50% of such teachers says that special need students are not able to follow the same curriculum as their peers, while 25% can only partially follow the common educative timetable. In the article “Inclusive Education for Students with Intellectual Disability”, it is underlined that the efficient inclusive education should accept the adaptation for the students’ needs. “They should atend various regular (mainstream) classes according to their ability to learn at the ‘level’ at which subjects are taught” (DJK, & Balakrishnan, 2012). For Result 2 – What do the results mean?
– How do they relate to the literature?
Refer to the literature you reviewed in task 2 plus additional relevant literature if desired.
Although the adaptation of timetables is recommended by the inclusive education system, most teachers evaluate their ability to apply special teaching strategies in their classes as moderate and insufficient. It means that there is a great difference between the ability of mild and moderate disability students and the teachers’ approach to them. In the article “Inclusive Education for Students with Intellectual Disability”, the reason for this doesn’t match between requirements and practical implementation is defined as the lack of training For Result 3 – What do the results mean?
– How do they relate to the literature?
Refer to the literature you reviewed in task 2 plus additional relevant literature if desired.
The results of our survey also support the opinion, stated in the article. The majority of teachers regard the collaboration with shadow teacher as the possible condition for the improvement of their skills for the education of students with mild or moderate disability. In the article “Inclusive Education for Students with Intellectual Disability”, it is emphasized that the role of this shadow teacher should be performed by “expertise of SEN staff” (DJK, & Balakrishnan, 2012). References
Djk, C., & Balakrishnan, J. (2012). Inclusive Education for Students with Intellectual
Disability. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development,23(2). doi:10.5463/dcid.v23i2.111
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!