Source of Dissatisfaction Among Job Seekers
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Source of Dissatisfaction Among Job Seekers
A Reliable Method of Recruiting New Employees for Your Company
I had the pleasure of meeting Megan at a recent networking event. Megan works for a firm that assists large corporations such as Shell, Nike, and Proctor and Gamble with new product development.
These large corporations, according to Megan, recognize that they can make incremental changes on their own. However, in order to develop new products, ideas, and approaches that will result in large-scale change in what they do, they occasionally bring in outside experts like her.
So, why are so many businesses afraid of bringing in people from other industries and sectors to work for them directly, when the best ideas often come from crossing disciplinary boundaries and looking at other fields?
A common source of dissatisfaction among job seekers is that they are “pigeon-holed” by what they have done or for whom they have previously worked, as well as employers’ aversion to hiring people with no prior experience in their field. What prevents a candidate who has worked in new product development in the food industry from applying these skills effectively in biotechnology?
Now, I recognize that recruitment is difficult, and most managers want their new hires to have a proven track record in the relevant field so that they can get up to speed quickly. Looking for transferable skills, potential, enthusiasm, and attitude is a more creative approach.
I’m curious if the chances of a successful recruitment, however you define it, are any different when you take a risk (is it really?). You’ll probably get more of the same!) you hire someone with experience in a different industry. The following are the most important points:
- to ensure that the interviewee demonstrates the skills and characteristics you’re looking for through their own experience
- When grading their responses, keep an open mind, and
- elicit information to see if the responses address your concerns about their ability to apply their skills and experience in your situation.
Apart from their attitude, which I consider to be THE most important differentiator, they may bring with them experience, skills, ideas, and creativity to help your company achieve the quantum leap it seeks. It’s like looking for gold when it comes to coming up with new ideas. You’ll find empty veins if you look in the same old places. However, if you go off the beaten path, you’ll have a better chance of coming up with new ideas. I’m curious why this is widely acknowledged in terms of product development but not so much in terms of hiring people. Perhaps it simply acknowledges that we all have a proclivity to recruit people who are similar to us.
To paraphrase Robert Wieder, “In a boutique, anyone can look for fashion, and in a museum, anyone can look for history. In a hardware store, the creative explorer searches for history and fashion in an airport “..
Hilary Jeanes is an HR consultant, coach, and facilitator. She works with people and groups to help them enhance their individual and team performance and reach their full potential. She is enthusiastic about learning and the importance of coaching, and she feels that a strong HR department can provide significant value to a company.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!