Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A PROPOSAL ADVOCATING FOR CHANGE FOR THE DISABLED
According to the Disability Discrimination Act, a disabled person is someone who has a mental or physical impairment that has a substantial and long-term adverse impact on his or her ability to perform their daily activities like the ability to move or carry everyday objects, ability to concentrate or physical coordination (Oliver, 2016). In the world population, over a billion people live with some form of disability with the majority of them experiencing significant difficulties in carrying out their daily activities. Many of these disabled people in society require the assistance of innovated and improved technologies to help them function normally and they use gadgets and devices like hearing aids, wheelchairs, and low-vision devices.
The disabled people especially those from developing nations have higher rates of disability and this is attributed to their denied access to essential services like health care services which makes them to develop some physical anomalies or become physically or mentally impaired (Watson et al., 2019). Although this is not only confined to developing nations as it also affects the low-income families living in developed nations who cannot access health care services due to factors like economic and financial difficulties. In recent years, many countries have taken the social problem of disability seriously and moved it from the medical or physical perspective to a perspective that takes into account an individual’s social, physical, and political context. This has forced countries to develop policies that can help make the world more comfortable and accessible for people living with any physical or mental disability like the employment policies and etiquette.
In America, the enactment of the Disabilities Act of 1990 by President George H. W. Bush was the beginning of a long journey of securing civil rights protections for the disabled (Ekstrand et al., 2017). The Act was meant to address various issues and discriminations that people with disabilities faced. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) would provide equality and ensure that there is no discrimination of the disabled people when it comes to employment and access to state and local government services. The Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits employment discrimination by a covered entity that is an employment agency, an employer, or a labor organization. These entities have the mandate to maintain the best employment practices that do not discriminate job applicants or employees who have physical or mental impairment. ADA requires these entities to avail reasonable workplace accommodations to people with disabilities to promote access to employment. The reasonable workplace accommodations may include purchasing office stationery and equipment that are height adjustable to allow disabled people using wheelchair to use the work surfaces.
Many years after the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the goals of the Act have not been met. People with disabilities have not been given equality of opportunities in employment and there are still cases of employment discrimination to persons with disabilities. Significant changes and advancements have been made in the social life of disabled people but there are still hardships when it comes to employment (Oliver, 2016). Disabled people still face economic barriers and due to denied access to employment that has left many of them in poverty crisis. According to the U.S Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions report in 2014, twice as many disabled Americans live in poverty compared to those living without disabilities, less than 30% of disabled people work, and households with a disabled adult earn 38.4% less compared to a household without a disabled adult (Erickson et al., 2014). The statistics are proof that there are economic independence and self-sufficiency barriers for people with physical or mental disabilities.
To change the employment policy for employment agencies and entities to comply with the Federal and State laws concerning the employment of disabled people as per the rules and regulations stipulated under the Americans with Disabilities Act I propose for the following changes: –
- To create social awareness of disability. Through social awareness campaigns and programs, cultural biases and prejudices will be addressed which will make employment agencies and entities to acknowledge the ability of disabled people to do meaningful work and accomplish assigned tasks like other people living without disabilities (Oliver, 2016).
- Giving the disabled people access to high-quality education and expecting a lot from them that will make them be academically qualified for various job opportunities and gain the relevant skills and knowledge that will make them competitive in the employment market.
- Removal of bureaucratic barriers like inappropriate work schedules and complexities for disabled people. This will ensure that employees with disabilities have enough time to complete their tasks and the work environment will be comfortable for them (Oliver, 2016).
- Employers should participate in programs and services for the disabled persons that are funded by the federal or state government to provide their disabled employees access to accommodation and transport. This will ensure that they can easily access their workplaces (Oliver, 2016).
There is a need for continued policy advocacy to a make long-term impact on the employment policy because it will help in identifying some needs and address any concerns that may arise in the future (Oliver, 2016). The continued advocacy promotes change and ensures that there is an improvement made to a social problem.
References
Ekstrand, V. S. (2017). Democratic governance, self-fulfillment and disability: Web accessibility under the Americans with disabilities act and the first amendment. Communication Law and Policy, 22(4), 427-457.
Erickson, W. A., von Schrader, S., Bruyère, S. M., VanLooy, S. A., & Matteson, D. S. (2014). Disability-inclusive employer practices and hiring of individuals with disabilities. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 28(4), 309-328.
Oliver, M. (2016). Rewriting history: the case of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Disability & Society, 31(7), 966-968.
Watson, N., & Vehmas, S. (Eds.). (2019). Routledge handbook of disability studies. Routledge.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!