Sociology Wilder Collaboration Discussion Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Sociology Wilder Collaboration Discussion Assignment
To evaluate the partnership for your chosen organization, you will conduct two (2) interviews. You will complete the Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory with the partnership representatives during the interview.
Summarize and analyze the findings from the inventory and your interviews, incorporating material from the required course readings and your own research.
You will complete this assignment by assessing a partnership using the Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory. You can choose a present/past field placement organization, place of employment or community group/association.
Summarize and analyze the findings from the inventory and your interviews, incorporating material from the required course readings and your own research.
Please use the following format to conduct your evaluation of a collaboration/partnership.
Collecting Data
With input from your past/current field supervisor or contact person within the organization you are using for this assignment, select a collaboration to evaluate.
To evaluate the partnership for your chosen organization, you will conduct two (2) interviews. You will complete the Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory with the partnership representatives during the interview. Interviews may be conducted in any format to which you both agree (e.g., WebEx, phone, Zoom, Google hangout, in-person, etc.).
Gather and review written materials that describe the collaboration such as a grant, memorandum of understanding, or written guidelines.
Interview Guide: Use the following guide for your interviews, making adaptations as needed.
Begin by
Explain the purpose of your assignment, including how you will conduct the interview.
Explain the purpose of the Inventory and how to complete it using the instructions found in the Mattessich, et al book (Please see the instructions attached)
Administer the Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory prior to or at the beginning of your interview (Please see the Wilder Collaborations Factors Inventory Attached). Ask the representative to answer the questions on the Inventory based on his/her/their involvement in the collaboration.
Questions
You will also ask questions beyond the Inventory itself. [Not all the questions need to be asked; figure out which ones would be the most appropriate to ask for your specific evaluation.]
Sample background questions include:
Why was the collaboration started? What is the purpose of the collaboration? Why is your agency involved in this collaboration?
How long have you been involved in the collaboration? What is your role?
What do you think your organization and other entities/organizations accomplish by being in this collaboration that you could not do on your own?
What do you think are the strengths and/or benefits of the collaboration?
What do you think are the challenges and/or weaknesses of the collaboration?
Sample questions based on collaboration factors include:
How has the political, social or economic environment facilitated your work in the collaboration? For example, current social policies, organizational policies, economic conditions?
How has the political, social or economic environment challenged your work in the collaboration? For example, current social policies, organizational policies, economic conditions?
What is the level of respect and trust among collaboration members? Can you give an example?
How open, adaptable and flexible is the group in how it conducts its work? How clear are the roles and guidelines for the group?
How engaged are other members of your organization in the collaboration? How do they view the work of the collaboration?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!