social role of basic research
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
social role of basic research
Multiple-Choice Questions
Name __________________________________
Directions: Record your answer on the line that precedes the number of the question.
___1. According to Nils Roll-Hansen, the social role of basic research or science did NOT include:
a. it was a crucial ingredient in the ideology of liberal democracy
b. it strengthened the economy
c. it was a knowledge base that served practical tasks through
applied science
d. none of the above___2. According to Nils Roll-Hansen, the root value of the post-World War II ideal of science is:
a. practicality
b. contribution to innovation
c. truthfulness
d. contribution to the economy___3. According to Nils Roll-Hansen, basic and applied research differ in their:
a. criteria for success or failure
b. effects on social processes
c. degree of autonomy from political and economic interests
d. all the above___4. According to Nils Roll-Hansen, political and economic steering is not appropriate for:
a. typical basic research
b. typical applied research
c. any kind of research
d. none of the above___5. According to Venkatesh Narayanamurti, et al., much of the debate over the “false dichotomy” of basic/applied research centers on:
a. the political unpopularity of scientific truth
b. the appropriate federal role in innovation
c. the role of science in the economy
d. the role of science in national defence
___6. According to Venkatesh Narayanamurti, et al., knowledge grows:
a. in linear fashion, from basic research to applied research to
engineering
b. in linear fashion, from applied research to basic research to
engineering
c. through a richly interwoven system with no clear hierarchy of
importance and no linear trajectory
d. as tentative discoveries are affirmed by authorities___7. According to Venkatesh Narayanamurti, et al., a critical liability of the basic/applied model of scientific research is that it:
a. is based on the researcher’s motivation
b. misrepresents the sequence of the steps in the
invention/discovery process
c. fails to recognize the crucial importance of economic factors
d. fails to see that the point of scientific research is not
understanding but application___8. According to Venkatesh Narayanamurti, et al., to understand fully the path of research requires:
a. understanding researchers’ motivations
b. understanding why governments fund research
c. adopting a short time frame
d. adopting a long time frame___9. According to Ralph Oman, in the debate over whether NIH should be able to require researchers to put their reports in PubMed Central, three key questions must be answered. Which of the following is not among those questions?
a. What policy will result in the broadest dissemination of high
quality, peer-reviewed scholarly articles?
b. What policy will result in the greatest income to authors?
c. Is the NIH correct in its assumption that the STM publishers will
continue to publish their journals even if they lose 50 percent
of their paid subscriptions?
d. Is it fair for the U.S. government to appropriate the value-added
contributions of the private STM publishers?___10. According to Ralph Oman, open access publishing will in time:
a. destroy the market for scientific, technical, and medical
journals
b. strengthen the market for scientific, technical, and medical
journals
c. destroy the research enterprise
d. invalidate the concept of peer review___11. According to Ralph Oman, copyright law is designed to benefit the public, and the public good:
a. is not the same as the benefits experienced by consumers
b. coincides with the rights of publishers but not authors
c. equals the benefits experienced by consumers
d. coincides with the rights of authors and publishers___12. According to Ralph Oman, which of the following are arguing that journals have outlived their usefulness?
a. librarians
b. academics
c. researchers
d. none of the above___13. According to Stuart M. Shieber, the mission of the university is to:
a. provide facilities and resources in support of teaching
b. provide facilities and resources in support of scientific
research
c. create, preserve, and disseminate knowledge to the benefit of all
d. provide a flow of intellectual property for the benefit of
academic publishers___14. According to Stuart M. Shieber, which of the following is not an indication of dysfunction in the traditional journal publishing system?
a. the inefficient peer-review system used by journal publishers
b. the long-term dramatic rise in subscription prices for journals
c. the huge disparity in subscription costs for different journals
d. the extraordinary profit margins enjoyed by journal publishers___15. According to Stuart M. Shieber, the Harvard faculty agree that:
a. journal subscription costs are moderate and affordable
b. universities, like professional societies, should publish their
own journals
c. it is good to obtain the widest possible dissemination for
scholarly results
d. journal publishers should be subsidized by government___16. According to Stuart M. Shieber, the idea that open-access publishing could put price pressure on subscription journals:
a. violates the laws of economics
b. is a demonstrable threat to the industry
c. is utter nonsense
d. does not violate the laws of economics
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!