Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Subject social issues marketing
Topic research report
Type Research paper
Level University
Style APA
Sources 3
Language English(U.S.)
Description
– 500 words; please write a new titleThis Report essay is aimed at alleviating the anxiety and worries of college students organized by R U OK in the University of Sydney in 2019. Since it is group work, we only need to write the fourth part without introducing the basic information of R U OK. We need to describe the specific activity content according to the seventh benchmark, which needs to be very detailed.
Part 4: IMPLEMENTATION: Communication strategies and tactics
• Concepts, messages, materials, activities suggested, i.e., communication plan (who, what, when, where, how often) (#7). Benchmark 7 needs to be used in this article to analyze what the organization is doing in this activity.-Start with the background and context of the program. Then, using the systematic total process approach of the UK’s National Social Marketing Centre, analyse the program, describing whether or not the program covered the eight benchmark criteria and how these were applied. For the final chapter of the project report, provide recommendations on how to improve or expand the chosen program. Please support your argument with real cases!! Must have Examples! Try to keep words simple and not too professional. It’s important to use real cases as examples of your point of view. The argument needs to be clear and specific. The beginning of each paragraph should have a summary of the main idea of the paragraph. References at least 3. (References from academic materials you find, and from the real news or cases with the website links). You can add references according to the actual situation. Don’t have too many quotations. Use more your own words. Please contact me ***
After topic approval, collect data and material on your program and look for references to the benchmark criteria. Do not try to analyse everything that occurs in the program. Focus on the five stages and how they incorporated (or not) the benchmark criteria. Use the academic literature (published books and journal articles) as well as the “grey” or unpublished literature, such as reports, articles, blogs, videos and presentations to assist you and for references.
Recommendation section only needs about 50-100 words.I need a detailed analysis of the content of the activity in the University of Sydney in 2019 R U OK Day according to Benchmark standard #7. Thank you.
Thank you!
According to the 7th benchmark standard in the attachment, the activities organized by R U OK in the University of Sydney in 2019 are analyzed, which are about relieving students’ anxiety and stress. You just need to write
4.IMPLEMENTATION: Communication strategies and tactics
• Concepts, Messages, Materials, Activities Suggested, i.e., Communication Plan (who, what, when, where, how often) (#7)
Then give some Suggestions or improvements based on what you’ve written. YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS: Ideas about campaign Improvement, changes, Enhancements. 50-100 words
please use the attachment “ppt” analysis the activity.
I’m sorry that some requirements of my articles need to be changed due to my misunderstanding. What I need is to analyze all the activities organized by R U OK in NSW on R U OK Day in 2019 and analyze their activities with the seventh benchmark. It should be the entire state of New South Wales, not just the event organized at the University of Sydney in 2019, but it can also be analyzed. It is also part of R U OK Day 2019, an event held in NEW South Wales.
Other requirements remain valid.
Spacing Double
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!