Small-scale and family farming models
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Small-scale and family farming models
Small-scale and family farming models are agricultural systems that prioritize the involvement of families or small groups in the cultivation and management of their crops and livestock. These models represent a significant shift from industrial farming, which relies on large-scale monocultures and heavy use of chemicals and machinery. Family farming models can vary significantly in their practices and approaches, but they often prioritize sustainability, resilience, and community involvement.
Small-scale and family farming models have several advantages. First, they promote greater biodiversity and reduce the risk of crop failure. By growing a variety of crops and raising a mix of animals, small-scale farmers can better adapt to changes in weather, pests, and market demand. In contrast, industrial farming relies heavily on monoculture crops, which are vulnerable to disease and pests and can deplete soil nutrients over time.
Second, small-scale and family farming models typically prioritize sustainable and regenerative practices, such as cover cropping, crop rotation, and reduced tillage. These practices help maintain soil health, reduce erosion and water pollution, and promote carbon sequestration. In contrast, industrial farming practices such as heavy tillage and chemical fertilizers can damage soil health and contribute to climate change.
Third, small-scale and family farming models often prioritize the well-being of animals and the environment. Many small-scale farmers raise their animals on pasture, which allows them to engage in natural behaviors and have access to a diverse diet. This not only improves animal welfare but can also result in higher-quality meat and dairy products. In contrast, industrial livestock farming relies on confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), which can lead to animal welfare issues and environmental degradation.
Fourth, small-scale and family farming models are often rooted in local communities and promote local food systems. These models can help provide fresh and nutritious food to communities, promote economic development, and build stronger connections between farmers and consumers. In contrast, industrial farming often prioritizes global markets and relies on long-distance transportation of food.
Despite their many advantages, small-scale and family farming models face several challenges. One major challenge is access to land and resources. Small-scale farmers often lack the resources and capital needed to purchase or lease land, access credit, and invest in equipment and infrastructure. They may also face competition from larger farms that can produce food more cheaply due to economies of scale.
Another challenge is access to markets and distribution networks. Small-scale farmers often face barriers to entry into mainstream markets, such as lack of access to processing facilities or the ability to meet regulatory requirements. Additionally, small-scale farmers may lack the capacity to market their products effectively or negotiate fair prices.
Finally, small-scale and family farming models face social and cultural challenges, including changing demographics and the need to attract younger generations to farming. Many small-scale farmers are aging and may lack the support and resources needed to transition their farms to a new generation of farmers.
In conclusion, small-scale and family farming models offer a promising alternative to industrial farming, prioritizing sustainability, resilience, and community involvement. These models have several advantages, including promoting biodiversity, regenerative practices, animal welfare, and local food systems. However, they also face significant challenges related to access to resources, markets, and social and cultural barriers. Addressing these challenges will require a collaborative effort from farmers, policymakers, and consumers to create a more sustainable and equitable food system.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Small-scale and family farming models
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!