SITXHRM003 Lead and manage people
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
SITXHRM003 Lead and manage people
Assessment Submission details:
- Please include following details on the top of your assessment:
- Your Name
- Your Student Id
- Your Trainer’s name
- Title of your Assessment
- Assessment Due Date
- Actual Submission Date
Please Note: Any changes in the assessment due date must be approved by your trainer.
- This assessment can be hand written or in Microsoft word format. Following settings should be made for this assignment to keep consistency among all the assessments:
Body text
Page setup
· Font: Times New Roman
- Font size: 12 point
- Line spacing: Double
- Text style: Normal
· Top: 2.54 cm
- Bottom: 2.54 cm
- Left: 3.17 cm
- Right: 3.17 cm
- Header: 1.25 cm
- Footer: 1.25 cm
- If hand written assessments are submitted, hand writing needs to be clear and legible.
- Do not forget to attach the Cover Sheet at the front of the assessment.
- Make sure you have signed the Cover sheet to declare this is your own work.
- You can e-mail this assessment to your trainer’s e-mail address with following details:
In ‘subject’ mention your ‘student Id – Your name’.
Achieving Competence:
To be deemed competent in this assessment you must:
- Correctly address all of the assessment requirements as described in this task
- Correctly address all of the submission instructions
- Successfully complete the Assessment Questions
- Submit assessment on or before the due date with an assessment cover sheet
Performance objective:
The purpose of this assessment is to assess your ability to complete tasks outlined in elements and
performance criteria of this unit in the context of the job role, and:
- monitor individual or team performance demonstrating at least four of the following leadership and management roles:
- decision making
- delegation of tasks
- information provision
- provision of feedback
- motivation through recognition and rewards
- planning and organising
- seek and respond to feedback from team members during the above service periods, in line with organisational goals and policies in the following areas:
- allocation or performance of work
- effectiveness of communication within team, between other teams or within organisation
- efficiency or deficiency in workplace practices
Assessment description:
Service Instances – Details
You will be observed monitoring individual or team performance demonstrating at least 4 of the following
leadership and management roles: (Select 4)
decision making
delegation of tasks
information provision
provision of feedback
motivation through recognition and rewards
planning and organising
The selected roles may be observed individually on several occasions or during e.g. preparation and service for a function, organising or holding an event or similar where a complete operational cycle can be observed.
Instance Date Duration from … to… Leadership role observed Instance 1: Instance 2: Instance 3: Instance 4:
Part A – Planning monitoring
- Once you have selected the activities with your trainer, you will need to develop a plan for the situation(s) where you undertake monitoring including:
- An overview of the activities typically undertaken by the team in the workplace or simulated training environment
- A description of the team
- The job roles and duties undertaken by each team member
- How the tasks to be completed during the instance(s) will be planned, organised and allocated, and communicated to each team member or the team as a group
- Provisions for decision making and delegation of tasks
- The documentation you will use to assist you to inform staff (e.g. booking information, menus, schedules etc.)
- The provisions for monitoring
- The provisions for de-briefing staff at the end of the service instance(s)
Part B – Observation
You will demonstrate your ability to carry out each of the 4 activities planned for in Part A. Using your knowledge of leadership and management techniques, you will need to:
- Plan and organise the activity (e.g. a meeting to provide workplace information)
- Use appropriate decision making techniques
- Delegate suitable tasks using the correct techniques
- Collect and provide relevant feedback from and to staff
- Use suitable motivation techniques
Part C – Post monitoring/observation. Evaluating the monitoring processes
- Provide an overview of the efficiency and/or deficiency of the workplace practices:
- What worked well?
- What did not work well and why?
- How effective was the communication:
- Between you and individual team members
- Between you and team
- Amongst the team
- How effective was the allocation and delegation of tasks to individuals and the team overall? What were the shortfalls or weaknesses you have identified, and which actions will you take to overcome these?
- What feedback have you provided? To whom?
- What feedback have you received from individuals, and the team overall?
- How have you used feedback received and in which instances? How will you use feedback received for future services as part of continuous improvement?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!