Short Case Essay Assessment Questions
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Short Case Essay Assessment Questions
Everyone must complete this assignment for all of the cases in your section. If you wrote a case, you are still responsible for the assignment but you should complete the table only for the other cases in the session not your own. The assignment must be submitted by 11:55 PM on Tuesday before your section meeting.
After reading all of the cases, download the Short Case Assessment Form and answer the questions in the order given below. When you respond to the question, give your answer to one question for all of the cases before going on the next question. In other words, answer question 1 for each of the cases, then question 2 for all the cases, etc. That way, it’s easy to see how your answer varies by case. Make sure your name is on the paper. Save the completed form as a Word file so you can submit it on Moodle.
1) Rank order the cases according to what you think is their importance for managers. You get to decide which cases you would like to discuss in class, and should explain what your criteria are for ranking them in the order you chose. In other words, you should have a reason why you decided that #1 is most interesting, #2 is next most interesting, etc.
2) Name the management concepts and models that you think are applicable in the situation and that explain why the case situation exists. Use your Mgt. 360 textbook as needed. Be as specific as possible. Stay away from very broad, general concepts like “leading,” “organizing” and “controlling.” Rather, for example, talk about very specific concepts like feed-forward controls, feedback controls, etc., and explain how they apply to the situation. If the case doesn’t seem to lend itself very well to answering this question, do your best.
3) For your 2 top-ranked cases, develop a solution or explanation that addresses the situation. In other words, you should attempt to address the underlying CAUSE of the problem, not just the apparent SYMPTOM. Use the lens of the management concept you identified above to develop your explanation or solution. Your solution should address the structures or context that created the situation or caused it to continue, rather than solving the problem directly by acting on the person or thing at the center of the case. For example, if employees are complaining about their jobs and causing problems with co-workers, direct action would be to discipline the employees or to fire them. Indirect action would be to change the reward system or redesign the job or re-organize the work flow or the work unit itself, etc. The best solutions will make the problems “disappear” by changing their context or environment such that solution eliminates the conditions that create such problems or allow them to continue.
Short Case Assessment Questions Your Name:
Case Name: Question 1
Ranking:
Reason:
Question 2: Management Concept:
Reason:
Case Name: Question 1
Ranking:
Reason:
Question 2: Management Concept:
Reason:
Case Name: Question 1
Ranking:
Reason:
Question 2: Management Concept:
Reason:
Case Name: Question 1
Ranking:
Reason:
Question 2: Management Concept:
Reason:
Question 3: Solution to #1 Ranked Case
Question 3: Solution to #2 Ranked Case
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!