SF 20101 Assignment: Black-box testing
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
201 01 SF
04th Assignment
Points: 15
Name:
a brief introduction
The goal of black-box testing is to check the output of the component under test. There are a variety of tactics to employ in order to test well. You will use equivalence partitioning in this exercise (EP). See Chapter 10 of the book and the slides in Canvas for more information.
Learning Objectives (1.1)
The activity is designed to help you understand the differences between black-box and white-box testing. The specific learning goal is to develop a thorough understanding of equivalence partitioning, a common black-box technique.
Getting ready (on paper)
Read the matrix program’s description, which is given below. (NOTE: For black-box testing, do not examine the source code!) At a unit test, specify test cases using equivalence partitioning (EP) approaches. To begin, create valid and incorrect equivalence classes. Then, for EP, specify test cases. Test inputs, execution circumstances, and expected outcome should all be specified. Ensure that both valid and invalid equivalence classes are covered by the test cases.
Output:
There is a single set of equivalence classes that covers both valid and invalid circumstances.
For EP, there are a number of test cases.
Case studies for BVA
Exercising (on computer)
Now use equivalence partitioning to test the matrix multiplication program (EP) Before the exercise, you should put the test cases you wrote down on paper into action. If you find equivalence classes you overlooked during the preparation, create new test cases. To finish this work, use the Python code.
Execute the test cases once they’ve been implemented.
It is necessary to write a test report that includes flaws. In your test report, carefully record your test outcomes. Remember to provide the test case ID, what is being tested, a description, the input, the expected outcome, and any other relevant details. Make a note of whether you passed or failed, as well as your thoughts on the problems you discovered.
EP has a complete set of test cases.
EP test and defect report
Application for conducting Black-box and White-box testing
The application’s goal is to use dynamic programming to imitate Chain Matrix Multiplication (CMM).
1- Execute the code that comes with this assignment.
2- The user interface will be generated by the application as shown below.
3- To add matrices, click the add button (number of columns in the first matrix must be equal to number of rows in the second matrix)
4- To compute the matrix multiplication, change the location of the parenthesis and click calculate.
Calculated time will determine how long it will take to perform the computation.
Using the position of the parenthesis around the matrices, determine the quickest computation time (ABCD..)
Conclusions and Analysis
For each test approach, consider the results of your testing. Think about the following issues:
Equivalence classes: How did equivalence classes come to be? Is it possible to make them better?
Test case selection: For each method, how many and what types of test cases did you choose?
Compare and contrast the testing methods:
Which technique performed best in this example (discovered the most problems, was the most cost-effective, etc.) and why?
When is each strategy most appropriate? Consider the situation in this case as well as in general.
When and why could different black-box test methodologies (at least 2) be appropriate?
Reflections and conclusions for each of the assignment 5 questions.
Observe
1. Provide an introduction for the section.
a. a summary of the report assignment, including its goal and purpose.
b. the White Box Testing Procedure, which should include a summary of your lab work.
2. It should provide a description of what you’re doing (same as for Black Box). Include McCabe’s Cyclomatic Complexity metric and the flow graph.
3. The Black Box Testing Procedure, which should include a summary and description of what you performed, i.e. the steps you took, so that others can replicate your technique. Include which test techniques were utilized, how they were implemented, and how the test cases for each approach were chosen.
a. Defects that have been discovered. Report on the number and types of problems discovered, as well as the coverage type).
a. White-Box vs. Black-Box Testing Compare and contrast white-box and black-box testing methods. Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each strategy, as well as when to use them (situations, cases etc.) The number of pathways in a program can be determined using the white-box technique by analyzing the codes.
Choose which ones to put to the test. Using the following methods to reduce coverage:
Paths of logic
Paths on their own
Coverage of branches
Coverage of the statement
References
Software Testing and Quality Assurance, John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [1] Kshirasagar N. and Tripathy P., Software Testing and Quality Assurance, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!