Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy
Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy
George Bailey (played by James Stewart in the movie It’s a Wonderful Life) was the chief executive officer of an inherited loan company (Bailey Saving and Loan) that operated during the Great Depression. The financial company provided loans to people to build and buy homes. George grew up helping others. He was well liked and respected in the community. It could be said that he proved to be a leader in the community. However, throughout the movie, George questioned his abilities, especially when he watched his brother becoming a war hero after going to college and his best friend becoming a rich plastics manufacturer. James Stewart captured the emotions of a man going through life with intensity and a sense of low self-esteem—a man who, at times, did not believe he could make ends meet and run the company.
Self-esteem is “a person’s overall self-evaluation or sense of self-worth” (Myers, 2008). According to Wojciszke and Struzynska-Kujalowicz (2007), power and self-esteem go together. Strong and effective leadership is positively correlated with not only high self-esteem but also an internal locus of control. In the case of George Bailey, there were other factors that seemed to interfere with his self-esteem and self-efficacy. Let’s discuss the factors that shaped George’s behavior.
Myers, D. (2008). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Wojciszke, B., & Struzynska-Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self-esteem. Social Cognition, 25(4), 472–494.
Perceived Self-Control.html
Perceived Self-Control
If you analyze George Bailey’s life, you might observe that much of his life was not in his control. Each time he planned something for himself, such as going to college, travelling, or becoming an engineer, his plans were obstructed by events that were out of his control. For instance, when his father passed away, George was forced to take over the management of the company to save it from being sold to Mr. Potter. Similarly, toward the end of the movie, George’s uncle Bill Bailey, an absentminded cofounder of the company, lost the deposit money of $8,000 at the time the company was under audit. This crisis situation forced George to approach the villain of the movie, Mr. Potter, for help, but Mr. Potter rebuked George, sending him into a self-destructive tailspin.
The question that arises then is, did the events that happened to George throughout his life constitute an internal or external locus of control? The answer to this question probably is that George’s life having many challenges and unexpected turns did not necessarily mean he had an external locus of control. Myers (2008) defined a locus of control as “the extent to which people perceive outcomes as internally controlled by their own efforts and actions or externally controlled by chance or outside forces.”
At the end of the movie, George’s guardian angel made George understand what would have happened had George not existed. George realized his life had a significant impact on the lives of others. His acceptance of being unable to control the unfolding events because of several external factors leads us to the conclusion that he had an external locus of control.
Myers, D. (2008). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
reason for choice:since Self-efficacy has become an important variable within social psychological research on its association with various favorable consequences related to mental health.
Developing a r esearch p roposal is a good way to experience the r esearch aspects of social psychology firsthand without conducting an actual r esearch study.
In this a ssignment, you need to develop a r esearch p roposal.
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Discussion and Conclusion
References
Each week, you will concentrate on creating a section of the r esearch p roposal. The Methodology section may be based on either of the two major r esearch designs, quantitative and qualitative. You will develop the f inal p roject as the course progresses by collating all the sections and incorporating them into a f inal p roposal due for submission in Week 10.
********This Week*****************
Work on the Introduction section of the r esearch p roposal. Include the following:
Select a topic for your r esearch p roject.
Explain why this topic is of interest to you (Be careful not to use first-person as this is a formal p aper).
Explain the topic and describe the potential research areas in the topic.
Using APA format, be sure to parenthetically cite your sources, and Reference on a separate page.
Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!