SECURITY INFORMATION AND EVENT MANAGEMENT(SIEM)
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The proposed topic
This project proposed the application of SECURITY INFORMATION AND EVENT MANAGEMENT(SIEM) in cybersecurity. This topic will explore the various benefits and opportunities within the topic considering the prevention of cyber-related incidents and attacks within the business setting. Over the years, businesses have progressed through the application of various technologies to meet consumer demands. These developments have offered businesses the ideal framework for accomplishing their goal, considering efficiency and reliability. However, numerous challenges have been witnessed considering business operations, success and reliability. These challenges relate to data and information security. Cyber-attacks have been reported involving numerous agencies, bodies and areas within the corporate sector (Fakiha, 2020). The quest for reliable interventions to handle cybersecurity challenges has prompted many businesses to research the best futuristic strategies to implement (Onwubiko & Ouazzane, 2019). Businesses that combine security and event management tasks create a framework that promotes efficiency in preventing breaches and strengthening their reliability. Therefore, using SIEM systems can help businesses collect information from multiple sources to supplement the management teams on the best intervention to consider following a reported incident from an information system dimension.
Plan of study
This study will focus on literature exploration. Using a literature analysis will help the researchers gather information about cybersecurity interventions’ history and their effectiveness. Further, this approach will make it possible to collect vital data related to the application of SIEM systems within the business setting to prevent data breaches and strengthen security. Additionally, the literature review will empower the audience with sufficient information about the best strategies to leverage SIEM systems to prevent cyber-attacks.
Purpose of study
The purpose of this study is to gather insight into the potential benefits associated with using SIEM systems within the business environment from a cybersecurity perspective. These systems offer the ideal framework for collecting and presenting data from diverse areas to a central point to benefit the management in events coordination and cybersecurity strengthening. In addition, this study will gather evidence from the past literature to document the potential benefits that the systems will offer in preventing or managing cybersecurity challenges and goals.
Research question
This study will be governed by pillars through which data will be collected and analyzed. The primary research questions governing and guiding this project are:
RQ1: What is the effectiveness of applying SIEM systems in the corporate setting to manage cybersecurity challenges?
RQ2: What is the possibility of SIEM systems providing futuristic cybersecurity solutions to redundant problems over the existing approaches?
What gap are you filling?
The proposed project addresses one of the primary gaps in information systems management. As a result, many businesses have suffered breaches targeting crucial data and information systems. Numerous research projects have been executed to create solutions to prevent data breaches and cybersecurity incidents within the business sector. However, their effectiveness has been affected by the lack of a foundation for understanding the attack vectors and adapting to the new approaches used by perpetrators. Therefore, this solution will provide the ideal intervention for preventing cybersecurity challenges like data breaches within the business environment considering real-time data analysis from multiple dimensions to influence automated or manual response to anomalies through traffic analysis.
Methodology
This qualitative study will collect information from diverse sources (Aspers & Corte, 2019). The study will collect theoretical data about the current and previous cybersecurity challenges witnessed within the business sector. On the same note, the collected data will provide the ideal intervention for approaching information security management and resilience in the future, considering the coordination of stakeholders actions concerning cybersecurity challenges prevention (Majeed, ur Rasool, Ahmad, Alam & Javaid, 2019). On the same note, using a qualitative approach will provide the ideal approach for understanding the effects of the current cybersecurity challenges in response to the research questions mentioned above (Mohajan, 2018).
References
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139-160.
Fakiha, B. S. (2020). Effectiveness of Security Incident Event Management (SIEM) System for Cyber Security Situation Awareness. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(4).
Majeed, A., ur Rasool, R., Ahmad, F., Alam, M., & Javaid, N. (2019). Near-miss situation based visual analysis of SIEM rules for real-time network security monitoring. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(4), 1509-1526.
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48.
Onwubiko, C., & Ouazzane, K. (2019). Challenges towards building an effective cybersecurity operations centre. International Journal on Computational Science & Applications, 4(1), 11-39.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!