Secondary Sources Bibliography Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Secondary Sources Bibliography Essay Assignment
This assignment is worth up to 50 points of your overall course grade. In this searching exercise you will search for secondary sources upon which to base your historiographical essay. Your professor will provide detailed directions for this exercise. Basically, you will use UMGC’s library search engines and other sources to find 10 or more secondary sources that have arguments about your topic. You will list those sources in bibliographic format, and provide information about how you located the sources and why you decided they were relevant to your project. You will start this assignment in Week 4 and complete it in Week 5.
Due: Week 5 (September 22)
Please read through the Research Methodology Module (on the left side of the course page click on Course Resources, and then click on Course Modules) and then familiarize yourself with the following instructions concerning your Library Project/Searching Exercise. In the Research Methodology module, you will find directions that will guide your use of the University’s library databases, and you will use the exercise given to familiarize yourself with the search procedures.
Your assignment will consist of two parts. For the Library project exercise, search for secondary source materials that relate to your research topic (part one). Use either UMGC’s or other libraries’ search engines and find at least ten (10) secondary sources (books or journal articles) related to the topic of your project (part one). At least three (3) or more of the ten secondary sources must come from your search of the articles from UMGC’s Library search engines; the other secondary sources can come from other search methods. An A is above and beyond what is required, so for a high A, go above and beyond ten (10) secondary sources related to your topic. Then produce an annotated bibliography of these ten secondary sources, and for each source include a one or two sentence annotation about how and where you located these sources (part two). Then turn in your assignment as a Word file via this assignment by the end of Week 5.
Keep very detailed and precise notes about which search terms you used and which databases you explored! Your written assignment (part two) is to prepare and submit a formal annotated bibliography of at least ten secondary sources that your search located. These citations will be in proper bibliographic format as per the Chicago Style forms, and each will have a brief annotation of two or three sentences (use complete sentences) indicating how and where you located these specific resources. Use “Secondary Sources” as the title for your annotated bibliography page.
You can find instructions about proper bibliographic formatting in the Week 2 Chicago Style formatting links. Bibliographic entries can be confusing, long, and full of fussy details. These are, however, fussy details that you need to master, both because they are the accepted norm for history writing and, for this class, you will be graded on them in this assignment as well as your annotated bibliography and final paper. Please pay careful attention to Chicago Style’s instructions on spacing, capitalization, italicization, and so on. You will be penalized for errors (so ask any questions you might have before the assignment is due).
In Weeks 6 and 7, you will use the secondary sources you have found to write a historiographical essay, a survey of secondary literature, for your topic. The point of a historiography is to define what has been argued about your topic by other historians. In a historiographical essay, you summarize what other historians have argued and written about your topic. By doing so, you will know how your arguments relate to those that have already been put forward about your topic. This will help you identify the arguments against which your new and unique interpretation is arguing. Therefore, when you search for secondary sources related to your topic, look for those which put forward an historical argument or interpretation about your topic; or if you are the first to look at a topic, what historians have argued about related topics. Thus, you need to search for secondary sources which provide an argument about your topic. You also need to get ahold of these actual secondary sources so that you can use them in your Historiographical Essay. DO NOT use book reviews.
You have two weeks to accomplish this assignment, and it is due via this assignment instructions by the end of Week 5.
DO NOT INCLUDE PRIMARY SOURCES IN THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY. If in doubt about a source, feel free to send me a bibliographic entry, and I can tell you what I think it is (primary or secondary) as best I can
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!