Scope of Practice and Patient’s Healthcare Accessibility
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Subject Nursing Topic Scope of Practice and Patient’s Healthcare Accessibility Type Discussion Board Post Level High School Style APA Sources 0 Language English(U.S.) Description Week 6: Scope of Practice and Patient’s Healthcare Accessibility (Orig Post due Wednesday, Responses due Sunday)
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to identify the scope of practice in one’s state including level of independence of practice, prescribing authority, any limitations of practice, process for obtaining licensure in your state, certification and education requirements for licensure. Next, students will discuss how the level of independence of practice in their state, i.e., reduced, restricted or full practice, affects patient’s access to care in their local community.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
1. Understand NP practice as defined by law (CO2)
2. Determine legislation as defined by legislation, statutes and regulations (CO2)
3. Identify barriers to ensuring patient’s rights (CO3)
Due Date: Wednesday by 11:59pm MST of Week 6
Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded discussion. The two posts in each individual discussion must be on separate days. Posting twice on two different days meets the minimum requirement however for full credit, the student must post?at least three substantive posts on three different days. The student must provide an initial post to each graded discussion topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 6. Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur no later than the?Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.?Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Threaded discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday of week 6, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).
Total Points Possible: 100
Requirements:
1. Discuss your state NP community in terms of scope of practice. Include the your state’s scope of practice for NPs including:
o Level of independence of practice **In California, NPs are required to practice under Standardized Procedure Guidelines. If CA is your intended practice state, please provide details on how Standardized Procedures Guidelines are developed in California and an example of a California SPG.
o Prescribing authority
o Any limitations of practice
o Process for obtaining licensure in your state
o Certification and education requirements for licensure.
2. If you live in a restricted or reduced practice state, how has patient care been impacted in your local community from these barriers? For instance, is the ED used for primary care? Are the EDs overcrowded with long wait times? Are there urgent care clinics readily available? Is there adequate access to primary care? If you live in a full practice, how has independent practice of the APN resulted in improved patient access to healthcare?
3. How does access to NPs impacts any healthcare disparities?
4. A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Scope of practice and NP requirements 30 30% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Practice barriers and access to healthcare 30 30% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Healthcare disparities 15 15% Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
75 75% Total CONTENT Points= 75 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category Points % Description
Interactive Dialogue 20 20% 4 Required Elements:
• Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;
• Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)
• Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)
• Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.
Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 5 5% Grammar, syntax, spelling, and punctuation are accurate.
25 25% Total FORMAT Points=25 pts
DISCUSSION TOTAL=100 pointsNR506NP WK6 Scope of Practice Discussion_MAR20
NR506NP WK6 Scope of Practice Discussion_MAR20
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scope of Practice
Discuss your state NP community in terms of scope of practice. Include the your state’s scope of practice for NPs including:
• Level of independence of practice
• Prescribing authority
• Any limitations of practice
• Process for obtaining licensure in your state
• Certification and education requirements for licensure. 30 pts
Excellent
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 27 pts
V. Good
Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 25 pts
Satisfactory
Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. 15 pts
Needs Improvement
Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of their state’s NP scope of practice. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Discussion did not include criteria.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Full vs. Restricted Practice
If you live in a restricted or reduced practice state, discuss how patient care has been impacted in your local community from these barriers.If you live in a full practice state, discuss how independent practice of the APN resulted in improved patient access to healthcare. 30 pts
Excellent
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 27 pts
V. Good
Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 25 pts
Satisfactory
Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. 15 pts
Needs Improvement
Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state how scholarly inquiry of whether their state is a reduced, restricted or full practice state and the impact on the local community with respect to healthcare access. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Discussion did not include criteria.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccess & Healthcare Disparities
Discuss how access to NPs impact healthcare disparities. 15 pts
Excellent
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 14 pts
V. Good
Provides some relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside scholarly sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. 12 pts
Satisfactory
Discussions use sparse scholarly inquiry and does not state scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside scholarly sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. 8 pts
Needs Improvement
Discussions do not use scholarly inquiry and does not state how scholarly inquiry of how access to NPs impacts healthcare disparities. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, reliable, or scholarly. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Discussion did not include criteria.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue
Must demonstrate the following elements:• Responds a minimum of two other posts to peers and/or faculty in the threaded discussion;
• Responses to peer/faculty are substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)
• Responds to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)
• Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.(4 required elements) 20 pts
Excellent
Demonstrated all elements for the Criterion 18 pts
V. Good
Missing 1 element for the Criterion 17 pts
Satisfactory
Missing 2 elements for the Criterion 10 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing 3 elements for the Criterion 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Missing 4 elements for the Criterion
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation
APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included. 5 pts
Excellent
0-1 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted. 4 pts
V. Good
2-4 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted. 3 pts
Satisfactory
5-7 errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted. 2 pts
Needs Improvement
8-9 errors grammar, spelling, syntax, and APA noted. 0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Post contains 10 or greater errors grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation 0 pts
Discussion late penalty deductions
A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday by 11:59PM MST, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). 0 pts
Total Participation Responses
A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).
0 pts
Total Points: 100please use New Jersey as the state
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!